Key developments since May 2003: Colombia began destroying its
stockpile of antipersonnel landmines in June 2003. In May 2004, Colombia
reported a revised plan in which the stockpile would be destroyed by 25 October
2004, prior to the First Review Conference. The use of mines by guerrillas,
especially FARC, continued at a significant level. Efforts to engage Colombian
non-state actors on the antipersonnel mine ban increased in 2003 and 2004. All
but two of the country’s 32 departments are now mine-affected. There is
still no systematic humanitarian demining underway, but mine risk education
activities are expanding. Colombia hosted a regional seminar on victim
assistance in Bogotá on 12-14 November 2003. In 2003, the Antipersonnel
Mine Observatory registered 668 new landmine/UXO casualties.
Key developments since 1999: Colombia ratified the Mine Ban Treaty on
6 September 2000, becoming a State Party on 1 March 2001. National
implementation legislation, Law 759, came into effect on 25 July 2002. In
November 1999, Colombia’s antipersonnel mine production facilities were
destroyed. Colombia began destroying its stockpile of 20,312 landmines in June
2003. Colombia served as co-rapporteur then co-chair of the Standing Committee
on Victim Assistance and Socioeconomic Reintegration from September 2001 to
September 2003. On 8 October 2001, the government established a commission
(CINAMA) to coordinate mine action and oversee implementation of the Mine Ban
Treaty. The government’s Antipersonnel Mine Observatory became operational
in 2001. A National Mine Action Plan was approved on 27 February 2003. In March
2003, Colombia and the Organization of American States signed an Agreement on
Cooperation and Technical Assistance for mine action. There is no systematic
humanitarian demining underway, but mine risk education activities have
expanded. Guerrilla groups, most notably the FARC, have used antipersonnel mines
throughout the period; the government reports significant increases in use in
2003 and 2004. The number of mine-affected municipalities increased from 125 in
1999 to 422 in 2003. Between 1999 and 2003, the Observatory registered 1,753
new mine casualties. The number of reported new casualties has increased
significantly since 1999, with 235 percent more casualties reported in 2002 than
2001.
Mine Ban Policy
Colombia signed the Mine Ban Treaty on 3 December 1997, ratified on 6
September 2000, and became a State Party on 1 March 2001. On 20 June 2002 the
National Congress approved Colombia’s national implementation legislation,
Law 759, which came into effect following Presidential approval on 25 July 2002.
The legislation contains penal sanctions of between 10 and 15 years, a fine that
is 500 to 1,000 times the official minimum monthly
salary,[1] and prohibition from
public office for a period of five to ten years. If the antipersonnel mine is
equipped with an antihandling device or set up like a booby-trap, the violation
is punishable by 15 to 20 years of imprisonment, a fine of 1,000 to 2,000 times
the official minimum monthly salary, and prohibition of public office for ten
years. Anyone who encourages, assists, facilitates, stimulates, or induces
other persons to participate in violations could be imprisoned for between six
and ten years or fined 200 to 500 times the official minimum monthly
salary.[2]
Colombia was among the “core group” of nations driving the Ottawa
Process that led to the Mine Ban Treaty. It has voted in support of every
pro-ban United Nations General Assembly resolution since 1996, including UNGA
Resolution 58/53 on 8 December 2003. Since the treaty’s entry into force,
Colombia has remained actively engaged. It has participated in every annual
Meeting of States Parties to the Mine Ban Treaty, including the Fifth Meeting of
States Parties in September 2003, and most of the intersessional Standing
Committee meetings, including those held in February and June 2004. Colombia
served as co-rapporteur and then co-chair of the Standing Committee on Victim
Assistance and Socio-Economic Reintegration from September 2001 to September
2003.
Colombia hosted a regional seminar on victim assistance in Bogotá on
12-14 November 2003.[3] The
meeting was opened by Francisco Santos Calderón, Colombia’s Vice
President and President of the National Mine Action Commission
(CINAMA).[4] In April 2004,
Colombian President Álvaro Uribe and then-OAS General Secretary Cesar
Gaviria spoke at an event organized by the Colombian government in Washington,
DC to engage various organizations working on the mine
issue.[5] Previously, on 17
April 2002, the Vice President’s Office hosted a landmines forum in
Bogotá.[6]
Colombia has participated in several regional meetings on landmines,
including in Ecuador (August 2004), Perú (August 2003), Argentina
(November 2000), and México (January 1999).
Colombia submitted its annual Article 7 report on 11 May 2004. The 144-page
report covered the period 1 May 2003 to April 2004, and included voluntary Form
J on victim assistance efforts. This was the country’s fourth Article 7
report.[7] Its initial report,
which was due on 28 August 2001, was submitted 15 March 2002.
Colombia has rarely engaged in the extensive discussions that States Parties
have had on matters of interpretation and implementation related to Articles 1,
2, and 3, and the issues of joint military operations with non-States Parties,
foreign stockpiling and transit of antipersonnel mines, antivehicle mines with
sensitive fuzes or antihandling devices, and the permissible number of mines
retained for training. However, during the June 2004 intersessional meetings,
Colombia made a strong and unequivocal statement that any mine that is
victim-activated is an antipersonnel mine, and is banned. Colombia expressed
concern that the threshold of what constitutes an antipersonnel mine was being
limited or narrowed, and stressed that the treaty is a comprehensive
ban.[8]
Colombia is a State Party to Amended Protocol II of the Convention of
Conventional Weapons (CCW). It attended the Fifth Annual Conference of States
Parties to the Protocol in November 2003, but did not submit a national annual
report under Article 13 for 2003.
Non-Governmental Activities
The Colombian Campaign Against Landmines (Campaña Colombiana Contra
Minas, CCCM) has been active in promoting the Mine Ban Treaty and in mine action
in the country since 1996.[9]
With support from the US Agency for International Development (USAID) and the
International Organization for Migration (IOM), in 2003 and 2004 CCCM
significantly strengthened its capacity to carry out initiatives and activities
at the departmental level, establishing campaign coordinators in fourteen
departments.[10] It
participated in a “Peso a Peso” co-financing system that develops
economic and employment opportunity programs for landmine survivors and their
families. CCCM continued to issue a quarterly national bulletin on mine action
activities in the country called “Colombia sin minas” (Colombia
without mines).
Another Colombian civil society mine action group, the Humanitarian Alliance
for Mine Action in Colombia (Alianza Humanitaria de Acción contra Minas
Antipersonal Colombia, Alianza), was established February
2001.[11] Alianza member
organizations have carried out mine impact studies and mine risk education, and
have assisted in the preparation of governmental bulletins on the landmine
problem in Colombia.[12]
On 26-30 January 2004, the International Campaign to Ban Landmines (ICBL)
held its annual regional Landmine Monitor researchers meeting in Colombia,
marking the first time that ICBL members had officially visited the country.
The ICBL issued a press release condemning continued antipersonnel mine use by
non-state actors, calling for the establishment of humanitarian demining, urging
increased efforts to assist mine survivors, and calling on the government to
complete stockpile destruction by the 2004 Nairobi Review
Conference.[13] They held a
regional seminar on mine action goals for the Review Conference, with the
support of the Canadian embassy, and with UNICEF’s support, visited the
mine-affected municipality of Zaragoza, Antioquia.
Non-State Actors
Colombia remains the only country in the Americas region where antipersonnel
mines and improvised explosives devices (IEDs) continue to be used on a daily
basis. Landmine use is just one feature of the armed conflict that has affected
the country for over 40 years. Various non-state actors (NSAs) are party to the
conflict, principal among them are the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia
(Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia – Ejército del Pueblo,
FARC-EP) and the National Liberation Army (Unión
Camilista-Ejército de Liberación Nacional, UC-ELN). Smaller
groups include the Popular Liberation Army (Ejército Popular de
Liberación, EPL) and the People’s Revolutionary Army
(Ejército Revolucionario del Pueblo, ERP). Paramilitary forces fighting
in the conflict included the large umbrella organization United Self-Defense
Forces of Colombia (Autodefensas Unidas de Colombia, AUC) and smaller groups
such as the Self-Defense Peasant Forces of the Casanare (Autodefensas Campesinas
del Casanare, ACC) and the Self-Defense Peasant Forces of Meta and Vechada
(Autodefensas Campesinas del Meta y Vechada,
ACMV).[14]
On several occasions, the Colombian government has called on States Parties
to the Mine Ban Treaty to take more action to condemn antipersonnel mine use and
production by non-state
actors.[15] Efforts to engage
Colombian NSAs on the antipersonnel mine ban increased in 2003 and 2004. On 4-5
June 2004, the government allowed imprisoned ELN spokesperson Francisco
Galán to leave the Itagüí prison near Medellín to
participate in a forum on landmines held in the Colombian Senate and hosted by
CCCM and the Geneva Call, a Swiss NGO that seeks to secure support from NSAs for
the mine ban through its Deed of Commitment. On behalf of the ELN Central
Command, Galán proposed a humanitarian agreement with the government to
limit the use of landmines and IEDs, among other measures, and he invited Geneva
Call and CCCM to work together with ELN to construct the
agreement.[16] Vice President
Francisco Santos Calderón opened the forum, which was attended by
Senators, government officials, diplomatic representatives, and
NGOs.[17]
This was the first time that ELN had discussed limiting its mine use.
Previously in May 2003, members of ELN’s Central Command based in Havana,
Cuba, informed CCCM and the Geneva Call that it was not prepared to stop using
mines, but it would be willing to explore the possibility of reaching local
agreements to reduce the negative impact of antipersonnel mine use on civilian
populations.[18]
In January 2004, CCCM, the Geneva Call, and UNICEF announced the creation of
a joint two-year pilot mine action project in the south of Bolívar
department, with funding provided by the European Commission and Switzerland.
According to Geneva Call, the initiative would allow for the establishment of
minefield marking and mine risk education to protect civilians living in the
area.[19] As part of the
project, the Geneva Call and CCCM organized a meeting on landmines and NSAs for
indigenous and Afro-Colombian communities on 17-19 August 2004 in Bogotá.
The groups subsequently convened regional forums on the issue in
Medellín, Antioquia on 20 August and in Bucaramanga, Santander on 25
August 2004.[20]
The ELN’s Francisco Galán participated via telephone in the
Antioquia forum and the Governor of the department, Aníbal Gaviria,
proposed the establishment of mine clearance in heavily mine-affected
municipalities including Argelia, San Carlos, and San
Francisco.[21] On 27 August
2004, media reported that the AUC supported the proposal to start mine clearance
in northwestern Antioquia.[22]
On 3 September 2004, Antioquia’s Governor Gaviria established a
humanitarian commission for Antioquia tasked with developing a plan to reach an
agreement for mine clearance, initially in the west, and to develop a strategy
for community rehabilitation and socioeconomic reintegration of landmine
survivors and their
families.[23] Both the ELN
guerrillas and AUC paramilitary forces expressed support for the initiative and
during a ceremony swearing in members of the commission, the AUC provided a
statement offering its support for the
initiative.[24]
Production
Colombia is a former producer of antipersonnel mines. The José
María Córdoba factory of the state-owned Industria Militar
(INDUMIL) reportedly produced two versions of one type of antipersonnel mine:
the MN-MAP-1 and MN-MAP-2. The MN-MAP-2 is reportedly a training
mine.[25] According to a
January 2002 government report, INDUMIL produced 22,300 MN-MAP-1 antipersonnel
mines between 1989 and 1996.[26]
Of these, 19,706 mines were transferred to the Armed Forces (16,410 to the Army,
2,590 to the Navy, and 706 to the Air Force), 52 were used in technical tests,
and the remaining 2,542 were
destroyed.[27] In January 2000,
the Armed Forces reported that antipersonnel mine production ceased in September
1998 and production equipment was destroyed on 18 November
1999.[28]
INDUMIL also produces the Claymore-type mine directional fragmentation mine
(Carga Direccional Dirigida,
CDD),[29] reported to be used
only in command-detonated
mode,[30] which is permitted
under the Mine Ban Treaty. Measures taken to ensure the mines can only be used
in command-detonated mode have not been reported.
Armed non-state actors in Colombia produce a variety of antipersonnel mines
and improvised explosive devices made from commonly available materials and
explosives. The governmental Office of the Vice President has identified the
following types of homemade landmines made and used by non-state
actors:[31]
Mina quiebrapatas (a “legbreaker” mine usually buried in the
ground);
Mina tipo sombrero chino (a Chinese hat-type conical mine with a radius of
25 meters);
Mina tipo cajón (a wooden box mine with an “angle-shaped”
metal plate);
Mina tipo abanico (a fan-type mine with a radius of 10 meters and a cone for
gases and shrapnel);
Mina cumbo (a mine usually placed on tree branches);
Mina tipo Claymore (a Claymore-type mine often found at the side of roads
and in forests);
Mina tipo costal (a mine in a sack thrown from higher ground);
mina tumbapostes (“knock down posts” mine for use at oil
pipelines, energy and communication towers, and other infrastructure);
mina tipo abanico antivehículo (an antivehicle mine);
mina química (a chemical mine), and
mina camándula (a “malicious” mine with explosives shaped
like a chain and used at the side of roads).
According to the
government’s Antipersonnel Mine Observatory, between 1990 and 1 September
2004, there were 23 events involving the identification of NSA mine production
facilities.[32] According to a
media report, between 1993 and 1995 the Colombian Army destroyed some 17,000
antipersonnel mines manufactured by the
ELN.[33]
Transfer
Colombia is not known to have ever exported antipersonnel mines. In the past
Colombia imported antipersonnel mines from the US,
Belgium,[34] and the former
Czechoslovakia.[35] According
to US government documents, Colombia imported 12,132 antipersonnel mines,
including 6,030 M14 blast mines in 1974, and 6,102 M18A1 Claymore mines from
1989 to 1991.[36] Colombia
reports it also imported M16 antipersonnel mines from the
US.[37] Non-standard
nomenclatures of the antipersonnel mines declared by Colombia make it difficult
to ascertain the types and origins of the mines.
There have been several instances of landmines included in illegal weapons
shipments destined for the Colombian conflict. In October 2003,
Colombia’s intelligence service, the Administrative Security Department
(Departamento Administrativo de Seguridad, DAS), reported that 186 antipersonnel
mines had been seized from along the Ecuadorian border since
1998.[38] In May 2003, a
Panamanian court sentenced four Panamanians and three Colombians to 20 and 60
months imprisonment for attempting to import into Colombia weapons acquired in
Nicaragua, including thirteen Russian antipersonnel
mines.[39] In September 2002,
Colombian police discovered 16 T-AB-1 Brazilian-manufactured antivehicle mines
stockpiled by FARC in a forested area near the municipality of Pasto in
Nariño department near the border with
Ecuador.[40]
Stockpiling and Destruction
In April 2003, Colombia reported a stockpile of 23,541 antipersonnel mines,
and indicated that 986 mines would be retained under Article 3 for training
purposes.[41] Including the
number of mines retained, the total was 4,125 more mines than declared in its
initial Article 7 Report.[42]
Landmine Monitor could not identify every country of origin for the mines and
some appeared to be antivehicle
mines.[43] A list of 4,194
antipersonnel mines provided to Landmine Monitor in July 2001 by the Colombian
Navy did not appear to be included in the March 2002
report,[44] and it is not
possible to determine if they were included in the April 2003
report.[45]
In its May 2004 Article 7 report, Colombia stated that 5,324 mines were
destroyed between June 2003 and March 2004, and another 11,450 mines were to be
destroyed between 15 April 2004 and 25 October 2004, for a total of 16,774
antipersonnel mines
destroyed.[46] The Article 7
report indicated that 465 antipersonnel mines stockpiled by the Air Force would
be destroyed on 1 March 2004 and 4,319 antipersonnel mines stockpiled by the
Navy would be destroyed between 1 March and 25 October
2004.[47] The report did not
indicate if these Air Force and Navy mines were included in the total of 16,774
mines. In June 2004, Colombia again reported that 23,541 antipersonnel mines
stockpiled by the Armed Forces would be destroyed by 25 October
2004.[48]
On 5 October 2004, the Ministry of Defense provided Landmine Monitor with a
document explaining the inconsistencies in reporting and destruction of
stockpiled antipersonnel
mines.[49] According to this
document the difference between the total number of antipersonnel mines reported
in 2002 (20,132) and 2003 (23,541) was due to, a) 2,951 mines transferred from
the First Fusiliers Battalion in San Andrés to the Vergara y Velasco
Battalion in Barranquilla had been registered twice; b) 1,152 MAP-2 training
mines had been incorrectly registered as MAP-1 in Army deposits in 2003; and c)
other errors in registries and the destruction in military units of 391 expired
mines.[50] According to the
Ministry of Defense, in 2001 the Armed Forces had stockpiled 21,537
antipersonnel mines, of which 20,551 would be destroyed in total and 986 would
be retained.[51]
Colombia’s treaty-mandated deadline for completion of stockpile
destruction is 1 March 2005. In May 2004, Colombia unveiled a revised plan in
which the stockpile would be destroyed in eight events, with the final event
scheduled for 25 October 2004, enabling Colombia to complete destruction before
the Mine Ban Treaty’s First Review
Conference.[52] Previously,
Colombia had announced that it would destroy the mines in 246 events between
June 2003 and February 2005.[53]
Landmine Monitor has documented seven destruction events between 26 June 2003
and 31 August 2004. The OAS and Canada supported the destruction events. CCCM
and Landmine Monitor witnessed all these destruction events and were allowed to
count the antipersonnel mines before they were destroyed. The numbers of mines
is based on the certificates of the destruction events (actas de
destrucción).
On 26 June 2003, the Army’s Alta Montaña battalion destroyed
496 Belgian-manufactured SOPRO PRB M969 antipersonnel mines in a ceremony held
at Usme in Cundicamarca department and attended by Vice President Francisco
Santos Calderón, and then-Minister of Defense Marta Lucía
Ramírez de
Rincón.[54]
On 30 October 2003, a total of 795 antipersonnel mines were destroyed at the
same location (552 MAP-1 mines, 140 SOPRO PRB M969 mines, 99 M16 mines, and four
M48). The head of the Colombian office of the UN High Commissioner for Human
Rights was among the dignitaries that witnessed the destruction.
On 1 March 2004, a total of 4,692 antipersonnel mines were destroyed at the
same location (3,540 MAP-1 AP mines and 1,152 MAP-2 training
mines).[55]
On 15 April 2004, the IX Army brigade destroyed 828 MAP-1 mines at Neiva in
Huila department.
On 31 May 2004, a total of 836 MAP-1 and MAP-2 mines were destroyed at the
Larandia military base, Montañita municipality in the department of
Caquetá.[56]
On 16 July 2004, the II Brigade base destroyed 4,545 mines in an event held
at Mesa de los Santos, Bucaramanga, in the department of Santander. For the
first time, landmine survivors were among the witnesses in
attendance.[57]
On 31 August 2004, the Palacé de Buga Battalion destroyed 677 mines
(389 MAP-1, 268 SOPRO and 20 M16) in Valle del Cauca
department.[58]
Between 26 June 2003 and 31 August 2004, then, Colombia destroyed a total of
11,717 AP mines (not including the MAP-2 training mines). According to the
Armed Forces, three other destruction events have been carried out without civil
society representatives
present.[59] According to the
September 2004 letter from the Ministry of Defense, 391 mines were destroyed in
total at the Military School, at the Bejarano Muñoz Battalion, and at the
Cartagena Battalion.[60]
A final stockpile destruction event was scheduled for 25 October 2004, in
which according to the October 2004 letter from the Ministry of Defense, 8,288
mines would be
destroyed.[61]
Previously, the government reported that 2,542 INDUMIL mines were destroyed
on 2 July 1999.[62]
In May 2004, Colombia reconfirmed its intent to retain 986 antipersonnel
mines for training and development purposes, all of them MAP-1 mines (786 mines
retained by the Army, 100 by the Air Force, and 100 by the
Navy).[63]
Armed non-state actors would appear to have extensive stocks of antipersonnel
mines. In addition to the documented widespread use of antipersonnel mines by
NSAs, according to the Mine Observatory, between 1990 and 1 September 2004,
there were 1,534 events involving the seizure of antipersonnel
mines.[64]
According to a January 2004 report, the Army’s Explosives and
Demolition Group (EXDE) in Santander found and destroyed weapons including 38
cajón mines, 357 quiebrapata mines, 97 abanico mines, and 151
antipersonnel mines.[65] In May
2003, media reported that FARC members captured in Medellín held
antipersonnel mines.[66] In
December 2003, media reported that antipersonnel mines were seized from
paramilitary forces fighting the Army in the municipality of Pacho in
Cundicamarca department.[67] In
February 2004, the Army’s “Diosa del Chará” Battalion
reportedly discovered a weapons arsenal including 40 landmines, during
“Operation Leopard” in Caquetá
department.[68] Between January
and May 2003, at least 136 antipersonnel mines were seized according to
information provided in a dozen media
reports.[69] According to
media, between 1993 and 1995 the Army’s Second Mobile Brigade found and
destroyed 17,000 antipersonnel mines that were either hidden or
laid.[70] In 1993, 2,000
antipersonnel mines were reported destroyed in Bolívar
department.[71]
Use
There are no confirmed instances of new laying of antipersonnel mines by the
Colombian Army since the government signed the Mine Ban Treaty on 3 December
1997. The FARC and ELN guerrillas are believed to be major users of
antipersonnel mines and IEDs, while paramilitary groups also use antipersonnel
mines.[72]
Colombia´s armed conflict dramatically changed course in 2003 and 2004
under the “democratic security policy” of President Álvaro
Uribe’s administration. As the Armed Forces recovered territory ceded to
the FARC by the previous administration of President Andres Pastrana in the
department of Meta, guerrilla forces retreated into remote, forested areas,
laying landmines as they went. In the same period, paramilitary groups began
negotiations with the government, as well as a demobilization
process.[73]
Landmine Monitor reported in 2001 that Colombian guerrillas had been using
landmines and IEDs for more than a decade and according to information collected
by CCCM had been using quiebrapata homemade mines for more than 15
years.[74] The OAS in 2003
noted that NSAs use mines not just in combat zones and around their military
encampments, but also along roads that have to be used to get from one point to
another (de paso obligado), around bridges, water sources, illicit crops fields,
and to damage oil pipelines, as well as prevent or delay their
repair.[75] According to the US
Department of State, guerrilla forces use landmines to defend static positions
(such as base camps, cocaine laboratories, and sites at which kidnap victims are
held) and as indiscriminate weapons of
terror.[76]
In August 2003, the OAS reported the Army destroyed 1,226 NSA-laid mine sites
in 2002 and 2003.[77] Although
in the past the Mine Observatory reported on the users responsible for landmine
incidents,[78] the latest
information available does not include this
analysis.[79]
Media reports of antipersonnel mine use are a useful information source, but
must be viewed with caution as they often report inaccurate information. The
categorization of some IEDs as antipersonnel mines can also be problematic. For
example, in Bolívar it was reported that a minefield had been discovered
containing six antipersonnel mines of ten kilograms of R1 explosives
each,[80] but according to the
CCCM coordinator in Cesar, these were actually milk containers filled with
explosives.[81] A number of
organizations led by UNICEF Colombia are analyzing definitions in order to reach
a broad agreement on the use of
terminology.[82] The
Observatory has also reached institutional agreements with the Armed Forces on
the utilization of terminology in teaching
documents.[83]
Use by Government Forces
There were no allegations of mine use by Colombian government forces in 2003
or the first half of 2004. Since the treaty entry into force in Colombia on 1
March 2001, there have been three unsubstantiated allegations of use of
antipersonnel mines by government forces.
A September 2002 publication by the Colombian Ombudsman’s Office
(Defensoría del Pueblo) reported that antipersonnel mines had been laid
around an Army base located on Inarwa hill (also known as Aguacil), a site
sacred to the Arhuaco indigenous peoples, in Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta in
northern Colombia on the Caribbean
coast.[84] According to the
report, the mines were endangering the local community and killing cattle. In
March 2004, the Commander-in-Chief of the Colombian Armed Forces, General Carlos
Alberto Ospina Ovalle, told the Minister of Defense that in November 2003, the
“La Popa” Army Battalion had confirmed the existence of a minefield
around the Alguacil military base, and ordered its destruction. After the mines
were removed, the battalion verified the clearance and informed indigenous
people that they could move freely in the
area.[85] On 20 April 2004, the
Ministry of Defense informed the Director of the Presidential Program on Human
Rights and International Humanitarian Law, Doctor Carlos Franco
Echavarría, of the communication from the General Command of the Armed
Forces.[86] Neither
communication indicated the date on which the antipersonnel mines had been laid
at Alguacil.
A 2002 annual report by the United Nations High Commissioner for Human
Rights, issued in February 2003, stated that at the beginning of 2002 the Office
was informed that the Army had mined the Munchique hills, an area crucial for
telecommunications in southwestern Colombia. According to the report, the
José Hilario López Battalion in Popayán claimed the
mine-laying was an exceptional measure necessary to protect a power station and
said the area had been clearly marked to prevent civilian
casualties.[87] In response to
a request for clarification, on 30 July 2003, the Minister of Foreign Affairs
Carolina Barco Isakson informed Landmine Monitor that the type of mine used was
the command-detonated Claymore mine, which the Minister noted are not considered
antipersonnel mines under the definitions of the Mine Ban
Treaty.[88]
In January 2001, the Peace Community (Comunidad de Paz) of San José de
Apartadó issued a public communiqué that claimed a local youth had
been injured by a mine laid by Colombian Army troops at a location where the
Army’s Vélez and Bejarano Battalions had
camped.[89] In a response to a
request by Landmine Monitor, the municipality ombudsman reported on the injuries
sustained by the youth, but did not mention who was responsible for laying the
mine.[90] The Army’s 17th
Brigade sent a denial to the State Attorney for the Urabá zone, stating
that the incident had been caused by a mine planted by the
FARC.[91]
Colombia has reported different and contradictory information on the number
of mines and minefields laid around military installations and infrastructure.
In September 2004, the Ministry of Defense reported that as of May 2004 the
Armed Forces had under its jurisdiction 22 minefields, properly mapped and
marked, with approximately 2,768 mines used for protection of bases and
communication
infrastructure.[92]
In its May 2004 Article 7 report Colombia did not provide any information on
mines planted in the past at Colombian Armed Forces bases and infrastructure,
but in April 2003, Colombia stated that 1,655 NM-MAP1 mines had been emplaced at
Air Force and Navy bases.[93]
In May 2002, the Commander of the Army’s Engineer Battalion told the
Standing Committee on Mine Clearance that the Army’s 54 minefields
containing over 20,000 mines were located at “strategic” sites
around the country that were important for the national economy. He said there
have been “no civilian casualties from these
mines.”[94] In August
2002, Colombia reported a total of 9,409 landmines emplaced at military bases
and installations (995 NMAP1 mines around Air Force and Navy bases and 8,414
antipersonnel mines around Army
bases).[95] According to the
Mine Observatory, minefields planted around permanent bases and tactical units
are in poor condition, due mainly to climatic
conditions.[96]
In January 2004, the Army told Landmine Monitor that 40 to 50 hectares of
land owned by the Mineral Exploitation Company in Santander department has been
mined with 350 mines to protect
infrastructure.[97]
Use by FARC
In late 2003 and early 2004, FARC carried out a strategic retreat that
included the use of mines.[98]
The major Western and Caribbean FARC blocs (bloques) acknowledged using mines,
and reported casualties of national Army soldiers in their minefields as a
positive outcome.[99] Most
information obtained by Landmine Monitor on mine incidents from media reports
corresponds with information issued by the FARC on its
webpage.[100] Landmine Monitor
has recorded mine use by FARC every year since it started reporting in 1999.
There were numerous media reports of mine use by FARC in 2003, in locations
including San Vicente del Caguán in Caquetá department, Aguas
Calientes village, Libano village, Solita village, Borugo village, and
Milán. The mine incidents continued in 2004; for instance, on 18
January, two soldiers of the 12th Army Brigade were injured by antipersonnel
mines allegedly laid by the 15th Front of the FARC in La Montañita
village.
In February 2004, an Administrative Security Department (DAS) official in
Caquetá department provided Landmine Monitor with information on Army
clearance of FARC-laid minefields in
2003.[101] These included
minefields cleared in Paujil, Aguas Calientes village, Morelia, and Milán
in May; in San José del Fragua in August, and in Doncello in
September.
The Fourth Division of the Army in Villavicencio, Meta department told
Landmine Monitor about Army marking of minefields laid by the FARC in
2003.[102] The division
demarcated 29 minefields installed by the FARC: one in Guaviare, one in Vaupes,
and 27 in five municipalities of Meta department (one in Puerto Lleras, one in
Mapiripan, four in Vistahermosa, nine in Mesetas, and 12 in
Uribe).[103]
A spokesperson for El Dorado municipality, in Meta department told Landmine
Monitor that FARC-laid minefields in the municipalities of Alto de Cumaral,
Caño Amarillo and San Pedro had caused the displacement of 33 families in
January 2004.[104] The
information was verified in an interview with an inhabitant of El Dorado, who
reported that on the night of 3 January, armed men identifying themselves as
FARC broke into his house and ordered him to leave the house within 24 hours and
inform his neighbors to do the same, as the area would be
mined.[105] The case was also
reported by local media.[106]
In one recorded case, the FARC’s 40th Front warned a young girl about
seven mines emplaced 30 meters away from the main path used by Army troops in
Los Naranjos, Mesetas municipality, in Meta department. The girl’s
brother was maimed by a mine while working in the
area.[107]
In February 2004, media reported that the Fourth Brigade deactivated a
minefield laid by the 47th Front of the FARC in La Quiebra, between
Sonsón and Argelia, in Antioquia
department.[108]
Use by ELN
ELN mine use continued in Colombia in 2003 and 2004, especially in the south
of Bolívar department. Some of the minefields in the zone have been
marked by ELN with warning
signs.[109] In the municipality
of Micoahumado, Bolívar department, ELN warned the civilian population
about its minefields, including one laid on the main road to La Caoba village
and others laid on roads near La Guasima
village.[110] Apparently the
ELN re-mined a football field in La Coba village after the Army had demined it
and left the zone.[111]
Mine use by ELN forces has caused displacement of civilians, as is the case
in Perijá, Codazzi municipality in the department of Cesar, where 57
families were forced to abandon their farms after the ELN mined them during
fighting with paramilitary
groups.[112]
In March 2004, media reported that the Army’s Fourth Alta
Montaña (Mountain) Batallion had located and cleared minefields laid by
ELN in Vereda San Andrés, San Sebastían municipality, in the south
of Cauca department.[113] In
April 2004, the Vice President’s Office reported on Army demining of a
minefield laid around an ELN
camp.[114]
The ELN considers mines as “an instrument of protection, a popular
weapon that is easily made, and is valuable in confronting the technological
development of the
enemy.”[115] Mines for
the ELN are a weapon for popular defense that are efficient against numerous
troops, providing “protection to small units” and preventing
“attacks by expeditionary troops.” Political denunciations of mine
use do not alter the need for protection, according to the
ELN.[116] The ELN nevertheless
has expressed an interest in reaching agreements in order to inform the civilian
population about the presence of minefields and create maps of the mined
areas.[117]
Use by EPL
In previous years, the EPL has used homemade antipersonnel mines in the south
of Córdoba department, and in Norte de Santander, Santander, and Guajira
departments, claiming that the mines were removed once military operations ended
as they did not have any territory to protect. EPL guerrillas were reportedly
not using antipersonnel mines in
2004.[118]
Use by Paramilitary Forces
Paramilitary groups, including the umbrella paramilitary organization United
Self-Defense Forces of Colombia (AUC), operate throughout most of the country.
In January 2003, the Antipersonnel Mine Observatory cautioned that while there
were no recent official reports of mine use by paramilitary groups this did not
mean that paramilitaries were using mines less frequently, as it remained
difficult to establish who is responsible for mine
use.[119] For example, just
over one-third (37 percent) of incidents recorded in Arauca department between
1990 and 2002 were caused by “unknown” users, but in 2001-2002 this
percentage increased to 60 percent and coincided with incursions by paramilitary
forces in the
department.[120]
The Antipersonnel Mine Observatory recorded 19 mine events during 2003 and
four between January and 22 April 2004 attributed to paramilitary
groups.[121] No details of
those events were made available.
In August 2001, a humanitarian group delivering supplies in the south of
Bolívar Department reported that, according to local community
representatives, “During counterinsurgency operations the paramilitary
groups have forced peasants to enter minefields with mules in order to clear
them, and have also used local people as human shields when entering dangerous
terrain.”[122]
As of September 2004, paramilitary groups including the AUC were in peace
negotiations with the government and some groups were demobilizing, but no mines
had been included in weapons handed in by demobilizing paramilitary forces.
This may be due to the fact that the paramilitary group that handed in its
weapons in November 2003, the Bloque Cacique Nutibara of the AUC, was operating
mainly in urban areas of
Medellín.[123]
Landmine Problem
In January 2004, the Observatory reported that of the country’s 32
departments, only two--Amazonas and Guainía--were not mine-affected, (not
including the department of San Andrés y
Providencia),[124] and 508 (46
percent) of the country’s 1,110 municipalities were reported to be
mine-affected.[125] By 1
September 2004, however, an incident had been reported in Puerto Arica
municipality in Amazonas department leaving Guainía and San Andrés
y Providenciaas the last two departments untouched by
Colombia’s ever-expanding landmine
crisis.[126]
Between 1990 and 1 September 2004, the Antipersonnel Mine Observatory
registered a total of 5,274 mine-related events, of which 70 percent (3,717)
were classed as “incidents” and the rest as
“accidents.”[127]
An accident is an event in which there are human casualties whereas an incident
does not involve such casualties. The landmine problem in Colombia is
overwhelmingly rural, as 95 percent of the events recorded by the Observatory
occurred in rural areas.
The departments in which the most mine-related events have been reported from
1990 to September 2004 are as
follows:[128]
Antioquia accounts for 21 percent of all events registered across the
country and municipalities with the most mine-related events registered include:
Apartadó (24 events), Argelia (31), Cocorná (68), El Bagre (37),
Granada (53), Ituango (30), Medellín (48), Remedios (49), San Carlos
(44), San Francisco (91), San Luis (69); Segovia (62), Turbo (31), Urrao (28),
and Zaragoza (23 events);
Santander accounts for 11 percent of the country’s events and affected
municipalities include: Barrancabermeja (99 events), El Carmen (40), El
Playón (23), Matanza (31), Rionegro (21), and San Vicente Chucurí
(91 events);
Caquetá accounts for 7 percent of the country’s events. Its
affected municipalities include: Cartagena del Chairá (18 events), El
Paujil (18), Florencia (75), Milán (21), Montañita (85), and San
Vicente del Caguán (86 events);
Cundicamarca also accounts for 7 percent of the country’s events. Its
affected municipalities include: Cabrera (28 events), La Palma (48),
Pulí (22), and Topapí (20 events);
Meta accounts for 6 percent of the country’s events and its affected
municipalities include: El Castillo (21 events), La Macarena (22),
Lejanías (25), Mesetas (53), Puerto Lleras (26), Puerto Rico (22), San
Juan de Arama (18), Uribe (33), and Vistahermosa (34);
Bolívar accounts for 6 percent of the country’s events. Its
affected municipalities include: Achí (23 events), El Carmen de
Bolívar (63), Morales (50), San Pablo (42), and Santa Rosa (23
events);
Norte de Santander also accounts for 6 percent of the country’s
events. Its affected municipalities include: Abrego (18 events),
Convención (23), El Tarra (33), Hacarí (17), Sardinata (17),
Teorama (23), and Tibú (50);
Arauca accounts for 5 percent of the country’s events. Its affected
municipalities include: Arauca (44 events), Arauquita (71), Saravena (58), and
Tame (88);
Cauca accounts for 4 percent of the country’s events. Its affected
municipalities include: Cajibío (14 events), El Tambo (14), San
Sebastián (18), Santa Rosa (27), Toribío (19);
Cesar accounts for 3 percent of the country’s events. Its affected
municipalities include: Aguachica (18 events), Curumaní (22), Pailitas
(15), and Vallepudar (28).
The number of mine-affected municipalities has steadily risen since Landmine
Monitor started reporting. In 1999, Landmine Monitor reported at least 125
mine-affected municipalities in 21 departments. In 2000, there were at least
135 mine-affected municipalities in 26 departments. In 2001, at least 168
municipalities in 27 departments were mine-affected. In 2002, the number of
mine-affected municipalities rose sharply to 256 in 28 departments. In 2003,
there were an estimated 422 mine-affected municipalities in 30 departments.
There could be several reasons for the rising number of affected
municipalities, including increased use of mines by guerrilla groups, increased
population movement, and improvements, refinements, and expansion of reporting
mechanisms. According to the United Nations, a Landmine Impact Survey is
essential to understand the scope of the mine problem in
Colombia.[129] Due to the
on-going conflict, there are no plans under consideration to conduct such a
survey.
Mine Action Coordination and Planning
The National Interministerial Commission on Antipersonnel Mine Action
(Comisión Nacional Intersectorial para la Acción contra las Minas
Antipersonal, CINAMA) was established on 8 October 2001 by Decree 2113 and
confirmed by Article 5 of Law 759 on 25 July 2002. Colombia’s Vice
President, Francisco Santos Calderón, heads CINAMA, which is responsible
for implementation of the Mine Ban Treaty, including the development of a
national plan, policy decisions and coordination of international cooperation.
The commission has two technical committees, one on victim assistance and
another on prevention, marking, mapping and mine
clearance.[130]
The Program for the Prevention of Antipersonnel Mine Accidents and Victim
Assistance (Programa de Prevención de Accidentes y Atención a las
Víctimas por Minas Antipersonal, PAAV), established in January 2001, is
the main program of CINAMA.[131]
The Antipersonnel Mine Observatory (Observatorio de Minas Antipersonal),
established by Article 13 of Law 759 of July 2002, is the central component of
PAAV. The Observatory functions as Technical Secretariat of CINAMA and is
described as Colombia’s technical entity responsible for collecting,
categorizing, centralizing, and updating all information on the mine
issue.[132]
Information collected by the Observatory is used to facilitate mine action
decision-making, as well as the general and technical direction, coordination,
implementation and monitoring of the national plan for mine
action.[133] Between June 2001
and February 2003, GICHD personnel installed the Information Management System
for Mine Action (IMSMA) at the Observatory and conducted training on its
use.[134] In 2002 and 2003, the
Observatory produced a number of publications on mine risk
education,[135] victim
assistance,[136] and the mine
problem in various departments of the
country.[137]
Under the government’s National Development Plan 2002-2006,
“Towards a Community State” (Estado Comunitario) of 23 April 2003,
compliance with the Mine Ban Treaty is considered a priority, as is the
strengthening of the Antipersonnel Mine Observatory, mine risk education, victim
assistance, and stockpile
destruction.[138] Under Decree
3787 of December 2003, the government approved approximately $863,000 (COP
2,500,000,000) for the PAAV for fiscal year
2004.[139] The funds are to be
used to redesign and strengthen the Mine Observatory and for regional
development of the national mine action plan in Colombia, and should allow the
Observatory to function independently of international
contributions.[140] The
Observatory held a series of meetings in 2004, with CINAMA’s victim
assistance committee in February, with the prevention, marking, mapping and mine
clearance committee on 2 April, as well as with departmental government
authorities (13 April), NGOs (14 April); and international organizations and
donors (19 April).[141] A
number of agreements were reached between the various actors as a result of
these meetings, regarding national policy guidelines, priorities, objectives,
activities, and timelines for the next ten years.
In March 2004, UNICEF Colombia hosted two meetings of mine action
organizations operating in Colombia to discuss their activities and how to
better coordinate.[142]
On 5 March 2003, the government reached an agreement with the OAS on
cooperation and technical assistance in mine
action.[143] The OAS
established an office in Bogotá in November
2003.[144] In 2003 and 2004,
OAS AICMA Colombia was tasked with establishing the country office, supporting
emergency preventative education and victim assistance campaigns, and
strengthening national capacity for humanitarian demining in emergency
situations in order to protect civilian
populations.[145]
On 3-4 April 2003, a UN delegation visited Colombia to review the
country’s landmine crisis and assess mine action
needs.[146]
Mine Clearance
Under Article 4 of Law 759 of 2002, the Ministry of Defense is permitted to
maintain mines laid before 1 March 2001 for protection of military bases, as
well as energy and communication infrastructure, as long as the areas are
appropriately marked to guarantee the safety of the civilian
population.[147] Under the Mine
Ban Treaty, Colombia is obligated to destroy all antipersonnel mines in mined
areas under its jurisdiction or control as soon as possible, but no later than 1
March 2011. According to the Mine Observatory, there is a plan to clear mines
planted by the Armed Forces within the treaty
timeframe.[148]
There is still no systematic humanitarian mine clearance underway in
Colombia. In March 2003, Vice President Calderón said it was not
“possible to conduct mine clearance as long as the country was at
war.” But, he also described an urgent need for humanitarian mine
clearance of infrastructure including schools, aqueducts and public
places.[149] A March 2002
report by the National Planning Department concluded that the best option for
mine clearance in Colombia over the short and medium term was to create 29
thirty-member mine clearance teams from the military to operate over the next 20
years at a total estimated cost of $21.9
million.[150]
Of the 5,274 mine-related events recorded by the Antipersonnel Mine
Observatory between 1990 and 1 September 2004, the biggest category—1,943
or 37 percent—consisted of military demining, while 205 events (4 percent)
involved suspected mined
areas.[151]
The Army has carried out limited mine clearance for tactical reasons and
during combat.[152] Military
clearance is carried out when bases and camps are established, as was the case
in Micoahumado where the entire village periphery was cleared of
mines.[153] In August 2003, the
OAS noted that this military clearance was not carried out according to
international standards for humanitarian mine
clearance.[154]
According to the Observatory, there were 22 humanitarian emergencies reported
to the armed forces in 2003 and another four emergencies reported in the first
quarter of 2004.[155] In 18 of
these cases, the Army responded and cleared 14 minefields in Catatumbo in the
department of Norte de
Santander;[156] one in
Caño Rallado in Meta department; one in Puerto Guzmán, Putumayo;
and one in Arbelaez,
Cundinamarca.[157]
Some information on military mine clearance in Colombia is available, but
much is contradictory and lacking in detail. According to the Army, it cleared
705 minefields in 2003, with June being the most active month (93 minefields
cleared) and January and December the least active (16 and 17 minefields cleared
respectively).[158] In May
2004, Colombia reported that the National Police had detected and destroyed 58
mines, but no further details were
provided.[159] In August 2003,
the OAS reported the Army destroyed 1,226 NSA-laid mine sites in 2002 and
2003.[160] In April 2003,
Colombia reported that the Army’s “Mars Group” (Grupo Martes)
had cleared 1,054 minefields in the past two years (including 877 mines in 25
departments in 2002) and had trained 877 deminers at the Military Engineers
School in 2002, and another 177 in the first quarter of
2003.[161] According to media,
in the first nine months of 2002, a total of 450 mine detecting dogs from the
Army’s Canine Training School in Bucaramanga discovered 480 minefields,
resulting in the destruction of approximately 5,000
mines.[162] In May 2002,
Colombia reported that during 2001 the Armed Forces had cleared 1,053 mines from
103 minefields.[163] According
to the March 2002 Article 7 report, in 1999 the Army cleared 51 minefields and
“deactivated” another 370
minefields.[164]
According to CCCM, armed non-state actors have conducted short-term mine
clearance in some departments following pressure from local
communities.[165] In January
2003, media reported that NSAs agreed to clear several minefields in Morales
municipality in south Bolívar so that the local population could return
to their homes.[166]
Mine Risk Education
Mine risk education (MRE) activities continue to be carried out in Colombia
by a number of actors, including the government, international organizations,
and national and local
NGOs.[167] In August 2003, the
OAS reported that international organizations and national NGOs in Colombia were
working independently from each other, resulting in duplication of efforts and
the delivery of contradictory MRE
messages.[168] In 2003, about
12,500 people attended MRE sessions supported by UNICEF, an increase compared to
the approximately 9,000 people reported for 2002 and the 6,000 reported for
2001.[169] The number of people
that attended MRE sessions in 1999 and 2000 is unknown.
In 2003 and 2004, UNICEF has focused its mine risk education efforts on two
departments, supporting implementing NGOs Paz y Democracia (Peace and Democracy)
in the department of Antioquia, and Fundemos in Cauca department. According to
UNICEF, all mine-related events reported by the community are passed on to the
Antipersonnel Mine
Observatory.[170] UNICEF only
carries out these activities where UNICEF will work in the future. An
evaluation of UNICEF’s MRE program is planned for
2005.[171]
In Antioquia, Paz y Democracia conducted out two mine risk education projects
in 2003, one in seven municipalities (El Bagre, Remedios, San Carlos, Segovia,
La Unión, Yolombo, and Zaragoza) and another in six municipalities
(Campamento, Carmen de Viboral, Cocorná, San Luis, San Rafael, and
Vigía del Fuerte). In 2004, Paz y Democracia continued to implement MRE
in four of these municipalities (El Bagre, Cocorná, Remedios and San
Carlos) and it started MRE in six more municipalities (Anorí, Argelia,
Granada, Mutata, Urrao and
Yarumal).[172]
In 2003, the NGO Fundación Antonio Restrepo Barco began a
youth-focused MRE project in the departments of Bolívar (Santa Rosa del
Sur municipality), Cundicamarca (Soacha), and Santander
(Barrancabermeja).[173]
In 2003, the International Organization for Migration (IOM), in coordination
with the Observatory, supported three mine risk education and victim assistance
projects in fourteen departments, directly benefiting 1,329 people and
indirectly benefiting another
10,100.[174] USAID provided
$110,355 for the projects and implementing partners included CCCM, CIREC, and
the Hogar Jesús de Nazareth NGO in Bucaramanga, Santander
department.[175] In 2003, CCCM
was responsible for the MRE activities in the departments of Caquetá,
Cesar, Magdalena, and Santander, and also provided MRE to employees of
Médecins Sans Frontières
Netherlands.[176]
In 2003, CIREC provided mine risk education tools to 52 community leaders
through its Seeds of Hope program, including six landmine
survivors.[177] In Cauca, the
Archdiocese of Popayán carried out MRE for members of the clergy,
educators, and through mass media, directly benefiting some 80
people.[178] The Secretariat
(Secretaría) of the government of Cauca department coordinated the Cauca
Mine Ban Technical Committee in 2003, including local institutions active on the
mine issue, as well as MRE. This program did not receive any funding for
2004.[179]
In 2003, the Colombian Red Cross carried out a baseline study on the landmine
problem in 20 communities of Antioquia, Cauca, and Valle del Cauca departments
that revealed the communities visited were not aware of the mine problem. The
Colombian Red Cross included MRE in its educational programs carried out in 12
departments, reaching an estimated 8,000
children.[180]
The Scouts of Colombia (Asociación Scouts de Colombia) continued to
implement mine risk education in four departments in 2003 (Cauca, Valle del
Cauca, Santander and Norte de
Santander).[181] In 2003, the
Scouts cooperated with the Attorney’s Office (Fiscalía) in
Popayán, Cauca department to implement a program entitled, “Because
in times of war we can still dream,” that used games and other activities
to discuss MRE and to train youth leaders as MRE
facilitators.[182]
In 2003, the NGO Corpojurídica provided mine risk education for
internally displaced indigenous people of Naya, in Cauca department.
Corpojurídica together with the Colombia office of the Latin American
Human Rights Association (Asociación Latinoamericana de Derechos Humanos,
ALDHU) carried out MRE for the Cofán indigenous peoples in the Amazonian
region of Colombia.[183]
Between March and July 2003, the Observatory held ten regional MRE
workshops.[184] In 2003, with
the cooperation of national NGOs, the Observatory sent a questionnaire to 199
communities in 23 departments to gauge knowledge, attitudes, practices, and
beliefs.[185] Detailed results
from the Observatory questionnaires are included in the May 2004 Article 7
report.[186]
The government also reported that with the support of the US Army’s
Southern Command, it established a series of training programs in MRE and
psychological support to mine survivors that it said would be carried out by the
Observatory.[187] One such
workshop was held in Cartagena on 21-23 February
2004.[188] In May 2004,
Colombia reported an agreement was concluded with Switzerland and the GICHD on
technical assistance and mine risk education regional
workshops.[189]
In 2002, the Observatory together with the association “Por un Hombre
Nuevo” organized mine risk education campaigns in a number of
municipalities in
Bolívar.[190] UNICEF and
Paz y Democracia conducted MRE in 14 municipalities of Antioquia and Cauca
departments.[191] The ICRC
conducted an MRE needs assessment mission in cooperation with the Colombian Red
Cross.[192] Between July 2001
and January 2002, the Observatory, UNICEF and the NGO REDEPAZ carried out an MRE
and victim assistance pilot project in 16 municipalities in Antioquia,
Bolívar, and Santander departments, in cooperation with a number of other
NGOs and organizations.[193]
The initiative was supported by the Observatory, Canada and the US (through
UNICEF). In August 2002, the Army’s “El Contacto” national
television program provided some mine risk
education.[194]
Previously, in October 1999, the government, UNICEF and the Canadian Embassy
in Bogotá signed an agreement to implement mine risk education in
Colombia. Videos, posters and a document on implementation of the Mine Ban
Treaty were produced.[195]
Mine Action Funding
Unlike other heavily mine-contaminated countries, international donors have
contributed little specifically and directly to mine action in Colombia. One
example of a direct, albeit in kind contribution, is that Spain provided
demining training to Colombian Army deminers in 2003. The majority of
governments have provided indirect support through international organizations.
For example, in 2003, Switzerland provided funding to the Geneva International
Center for Humanitarian Demining (GICHD) for supervision of mine risk education
in Colombia, and together with the EU, Switzerland has supported activities by
the Geneva Call to engage Colombian non-state actors. . Colombia’s April
2003 Article 7 report estimated that $13.8 million (38.35 billion pesos) was
needed for mine action activities between 2003 and 2006, including $2.4 million
(6.7 billion pesos) for
2003.[196] In May 2003, the
government reported a national allocation of $4.9 million (13.78 billion pesos)
for landmine activities in the period
2003-2006.[197]
In 2003, the Colombian government reported spending approximately $882,000
(2.47 billion pesos) on landmines activities, as well another $12,000 provided
through the Peace Investment Fund of Plan
Colombia.[198] In 2003,
Switzerland provided $50,000 to the Observatory to support technical cooperation
and assistance by the
GICHD.[199]
In December 2003, the Colombian government approved approximately $863,000
(COP 2,500,000,000) to the PAAV for fiscal year 2004 for the Antipersonnel Mine
Observatory.[200] In 2004, the
Observatory received $116,267 from the IOM through a cooperation agreement with
the Office of the President (Presidencia), and $50,000 from the UN Development
Programme for mine action in Meta and Antioquia departments and in the the
Montes de María
region.[201] In 2004,
Switzerland provided $123,200 to the Observatory for mine risk education
activities implemented with the assistance from the
GICHD.[202]
In June 2004, a report by the Resource Mobilization Contact Group of States
Parties, indicated that the Colombian government spent a total of $8.5 million
($8,478,346) on mine action between 1999-2002, including $3.3 million
($3,277,208) in 2002, $4.8 million ($4,852,528) in 2001, $86,803 in 2000, and
$261,807 in 1999.[203]
According to the April 2003 Article 7 report, the OAS was supposed to provide
$496,906 for mine action in Colombia under the two-year agreement reached with
the government in March
2003.[204] In February 2004,
the OAS AICMA Colombia reported that Canada had provided $115,000 of the
budgeted funds for the period April 2003-April
2004.[205] In May 2003, the OAS
presented a projection of financial requirements for its activities in Colombia,
estimating that a total of $3.3 million would be needed between 2003-2007:
$200,000 in 2003, $300,000 in 2004, $800,000 in 2005, $1 million in 2006, and $1
million in 2007.[206]
According to UNICEF, it budgeted $428,063 for its mine activities in Colombia
(mine risk education, victim assistance and advocacy) for the period January
2003-December 2004.[207]
According to the Colombian Red Cross, its mine action budget for 2004 was
$25,000.[208] Between 2003-2004,
CCCM budgeted $124,994 for its activities and received $98,448 from USAID and
IOM and the rest from its own
funds.[209] CIREC´s annual
budget for 2004 was $140,000, with funds provided by the IOM and
CIREC.[210] The 2004 budget for
the MRE project of the Fundación Antonio Restrepo Barco was $120,000 and
funding was provided by the UK Charity “Children of the Andes,” the
Diana, Princess of Wales Fund and its own
resources.[211]
Landmine Casualties
In 2003, the Antipersonnel Mine Observatory registered 668 new landmine/UXO
casualties (156 people killed and 512 injured); 195 were civilians, including at
least 19 women and 49
children.[212] The number of
reported new casualties has increased significantly since 1999. Between 1999
and 2002, the Observatory registered 1,085 new mine casualties (233 killed, 848
injured and four unknown): 626 in 2002 (132 killed, 490 injured and four
unknown); 268 in 2001 (47 killed and 221 injured); 141 in 2000 (31 killed and
110 injured); 50 in 1999 (23 killed and 27 injured). Of the total casualties,
520 were civilians, including at least 41 women and 177 children.
Casualties continue to be reported in 2004. By 1 September 2004, the
Observatory had registered 421 new mine casualties (109 people killed and 312
injured) since January; 127 were civilians, including at least seven women and
31 children. The Observatory’s registry of mine casualties in Colombia
uses IMSMA and information is obtained from departmental and municipal
authorities, regional ombudsmen, Administrative Security Department bulletins,
civilians, and from six Colombian
newspapers.[213] Data
collection is an on-going process with statistics continually updated as new
casualties, and those from previous periods, are
identified.[214] In 2002/2003
the OAS AICMA program in Colombia supported the Observatory in recording and
monitoring information on casualties and
survivors.[215]
Significant under-reporting of casualties is assumed. Civilians injured by
landmines in rural areas are often a significant distance from available
healthcare services, and if they do reach those services their injuries may not
be recorded as mine-related. Civilians may purposely not report their injury as
mine-related for fear of being labeled as a combatant by one or other party to
the conflict. There is also under-reporting of casualties among armed NSAs in
Colombia. The Observatory has reports of only 16 NSA mine casualties since
1999, and a total of 33 since 1990.
From 1990 to 1 September 2004, the Observatory recorded a total of 3,022
mine/UXO casualties (732 people killed, 2,295 injured, and four unknown) from
1,557 accidents;[216] 1,114 were
civilians, including at least 115 women and 368
children.[217] The most common
activities at the time of the accident were military activities 1,852 casualties
(61 percent); passing near the place 283 casualties (nine percent); farming 113
casualties (four percent); playing 49 casualties (two percent); other 66
casualties (two percent); tampering 15 casualties (one percent); gathering
water, firewood or food 13 casualties (one percent); and unknown 598 casualties
(20 percent).[218]
The ten Colombian departments with the most reported casualties are:
Antioquia with 678 casualties (22 percent); Bolívar 323 casualties
(eleven percent); Santander 256 casualties (eight percent); Caquetá 236
casualties (eight percent); Norte de Santander 172 casualties (six percent);
Meta 164 casualties (five percent); Cauca 163 casualties (five percent);
Cundinamarca 140 casualties (five percent); Arauca 109 casualties (four
percent); and Cesar 104 casualties (three
percent).[219]
Survivor Assistance
In Colombia, emergency care at the scene of a mine incident is reportedly
deficient, medical treatment and surgery in regional hospitals is slow, and
transport to medical facilities is inadequate. In rural areas, it is difficult
to get immediate medical help, and it can sometimes take hours or even days to
reach the nearest hospital. Medical and rehabilitation services for mine
survivors in Colombia are for the most part located in the main urban centers,
whereas most survivors live in rural areas. Some survivors claim that they had
not received any rehabilitation treatment six months after the incident and some
a year afterwards.[220] Rural
survivors reportedly lack the resources necessary for transportation, lodging,
and meals.[221] Roadblocks,
stoppages of public transport, and prohibitions imposed by combatants sometimes
prevent survivors from reaching medical care. Landmine Monitor interviews with
mine survivors revealed that on average it had taken 12 hours to reach a
regional hospital, some survivors had been sent home without prostheses or
rehabilitation after amputation surgery, others had paid for treatment that they
were entitled to free under the law and had not received any benefits or
assistance since the
incident.[222]
Authorities acknowledged that medical care is made difficult by the distance
between the place of the incident and the healthcare centers, by a lack of
knowledge of first aid, and by limitations in social and economic
rehabilitation. Most resources for survivor assistance are directed at
emergency medical care and physical rehabilitation, while activities focused on
psychosocial support and economic reintegration is
limited.[223]
In response to the lack of adequate survivor assistance, the government
launched the Program for Mine Accident Prevention and Victim Assistance in 2001.
The victim assistance component of the program includes medical care and
rehabilitation, educational reintegration, vocational reintegration, and
accessibility to the physical
environment.[224]
In May 2003, Colombia reported that the average cost for transportation of a
mine survivor was $2,668, for therapy $517, and for a prosthesis
$25,000.[225]
Military personnel have access to programs for physical rehabilitation and
psychosocial support.[226] The
Amputees Center of the Central Military Hospital (Hospital Militar Central) in
Bogotá, reports that in 2003, 69 amputees with war-wounds were
registered,[227] including mine
survivors.
There are five main centers providing physical rehabilitation and prostheses
for landmine survivors and other persons with disabilities in Colombia: the
Hospital Militar de Colombia in Bogotá; the San Juan Bautista Orthopedic
Center in Bucaramanga, Santander; the Antioquia Rehabilitation Committee in
Medellín; the REI Foundation in Cartagena, Bolívar; and CIREC
(Centro Integral de Rehabilitación de Colombia) in Bogotá.
Another small facility is located in Santa Marta, Magdalena department, where
French amputee Jean-Charles Dérien established the ‘El derecho a
caminar’ (The right to walk) Foundation. The foundation has produced 43
prostheses, which are free for children, and Dérien is working to create
a rehabilitation center for war
amputees.[228]
CIREC (Centro Integral de Rehabilitación de Colombia) provides
integrated rehabilitation services to amputees and other persons with
disabilities, producing an average of 500 lower limb prostheses and 3,000
orthoses annually as well as medical services, physical and occupational
therapy, psychosocial support, educational opportunities, and direct financial
assistance if necessary. Rural inhabitants with limited economic resources
constitute ninety percent of the mine survivors and other war-disabled cared for
by CIREC and sixty percent are men aged between 20 and 40 years who are heads of
family. Nearly half (45 percent) of CIREC employees are people with a
disability.[229] The Swedish
International Development Agency (SIDA), through Star of Hope International, has
supported CIREC since 1985.[230]
Other donors in 2003 include the IOM.
On 8-11 May 2003, at CIREC’s Second National Gathering for Victim
Assistance, a total of 220 persons, including 60 mine survivors, participated in
workshops on leadership, community-based rehabilitation, technologies, rights of
the disabled, arts, and other
topics.[231] In September 2003,
CIREC assisted seven mine survivors associated with CCCM who came from areas in
Bolívar department where there are no government assistance programs. In
January 2004, CIREC assisted another 16 landmine survivors brought to
Bogotá by the CCCM with the support of the IOM, a supermarket chain
(Mercadefam S.A.) and the Medellín NGO Paz y Democracia. The government
was asked to assume the costs of this assistance effort, in accordance with Law
418 of 1997. CIREC’s “Semillas de Esperanza” (Seeds of Hope)
community leadership program aims to empower persons with disabilities,
including mine survivors.[232]
In late January 2004, the program’s regional teams and coordinators,
including indigenous teams, presented and discussed their projects in a national
meeting held at CIREC in Bogotá. Landmine survivors participating in the
program made presentations at regional mine action seminars held in Perú
(August 2003) and Ecuador (August 2004).
The Rehabilitación Integral (REI) Foundation orthopedic workshop in
Cartagena, Bolívar is supported by Handicap International (HI). REI
focuses on disability prevention, rehabilitation and reintegration of persons
with disabilities. A community-based rehabilitation project was started in
2000. In 2003, HI provided training to teachers and community-workers in
Cartagena to facilitate access to health services for persons with disabilities.
The HI program also provides prostheses, psychosocial support and home-care, and
is supported by the embassies of Canada and Switzerland, and by the Belgian
International Cooperation
Agency.[233]
In April 2002, the Italian NGO Movimondo began a two-year community-based
rehabilitation project in two neighborhoods of Cartagena and in Carmen de
Bolívar and Magangué municipalities in Bolívar department,
for people injured in the armed conflict. In 2003, Movimondo had two projects,
one a primary healthcare and integrated rehabilitation project for victims of
violence, benefiting 252 families in Tumaco, Nariño Department, and
Buenaventura, Valle del Cauca department. The second project focused on
rehabilitation in three municipalities of Bolívar department to
strengthen the capacity of local institutions to better respond to the needs of
persons with
disabilities.[234]
The ICRC facilitates access to specialized medical care for civilian
war-wounded and provides information on rights and available assistance. When
no assistance is available, the ICRC assists with referrals to rehabilitation,
transportation, lodgings and meals. The ICRC does not have rehabilitation
facilities of its own but has agreements with CIREC and the San Felipe Nieri
Home. In 2003, the ICRC facilitated the treatment of 48 war-wounded people,
referred 368 to the national healthcare service, and supported the physical
rehabilitation of another 18 war-wounded. In 2002, the ICRC operated four
mobile health units and facilitated access to specialized medical care for 304
civilian war-wounded.[235] It
is not known if any were landmine survivors. In Santander, the ICRC supported
23 war-wounded in 2002 and eight in
2003.[236]
A directory of rehabilitation services in Colombia (Directorio de Servicios
de Rehabilitación, Colombia 2003) was published in May 2003, as a joint
initiative between CIREC, Landmine Survivors Network (LSN), and Canada. The
directory covered fifteen departments and 66 municipalities that are seriously
mine-affected. CIREC also released “Antipersonnel Mines: a puzzle waiting
to be put together – a survey on rehabilitation for survivors in
Colombia” (Las Minas Antipersonal: un rompe-cabezas por armar –
Diagnóstico de la rehabilitación de los sobrevivientes en
Colombia). The study, supported by Canada, Norway, and LSN, was carried out to
better understand the needs of mine/UXO
survivors.[237]
Other initiatives to support mine/UXO survivors include development plans in
Bolívar department with a victim assistance component, and a victim
assistance committee in Sucre
department.[238] In Antioquia,
a committee provides rehabilitation and prostheses to mine survivors referred by
CCCM and Medellín hospitals, charging their services to the FOSYGA
(Social Solidarity and Guarantee Fund) state
fund.[239] In some cases
departmental governments have provided resources to facilitate survivor
reintegration. In Magdalena the departmental government provided $1,200 to
support the reintegration of two mine
survivors.[240]
In Antioquia and Cauca, NGOs Paz y Democracia and Fundemos provide legal and
education assistance to survivors with the support of
UNICEF.[241] The Hogar
Jesús de Nazareth (Jesus of Nazareth Home) has supported the
rehabilitation of 20 landmine/UXO survivors, in cooperation with the
Fundación Mujeres en Pie (Women Standing Up Foundation) and Christoffel
Blindenmission (CBM). IOM also provides health professionals to assist the
survivors.[242] In Santander,
the Juan Diego Restrepo orthopedic workshop provides prostheses to the Armed
Forces, and the Everardo Rojas orthopedic workshop provides prostheses and
orthoses to the Hogar Jesús de
Nazareth.[243] The University
Hospital Ramón Gonzaléz Valencia in Bucaramanga, Santander,
assisted 12 mine casualties in 2003, from Bolívar, Arauca, Norte de
Santander, Cesar, and Santander
departments.[244] The
association Confepaz (With Faith, Peace) supports 400 ex-soldiers and
demobilized guerrillas; many are disabled. The association provides employment
advice, legal aid, and psychosocial support to veterans from both
sides.[245] In 2002 the NGO
Corpojurídica provided legal assistance to 15 mine
survivors.[246] In
Bolívar, the association “Por un Hombre Nuevo,” in
collaboration with the departmental government and the church, organized
workshops and trained teams to provide psychosocial support to survivors in
several municipalities.[247]
On 12-14 November 2003, the Vice President’s Office supported by the
OAS and the James Madison University (US), held a regional seminar on mine
victim assistance in Bogotá. Representatives from Colombia, Argentina,
Canada, Chile, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua,
Perú, the United States, OAS, James Madison University, GICHD, UNDP,
CCCM, and CIREC
attended.[248]
Two Colombian mine survivors participated in the Raising the Voices program
in 2001.[249]
Colombia has submitted the voluntary Form J with all its annual Article 7
reports, with detailed information on mine victim assistance activities.
Disability Policy and Practice
Colombia has legislation to protect the rights of persons with disabilities,
including landmine
survivors.[250] The
legislation’s effectiveness is reportedly limited by the low capacity of
the health and state sectors to react, the lack of intersectorial coordination,
and the lack of institutional
leadership.[251]
Civilian casualties of antipersonnel mines and UXO are entitled to receive
services, subsidies and assistance according to Law 418 of 1997 which
established the obligation of the state to care for victims of political
violence. Law 418 was extended and modified by Law 548 of 1999 and extended
again by Law 782 of 2002. Compensation in the form of benefits and subsidies
are available at different levels. Through the Ministry of the Interior FOSYGA
fund (Solidarity and Guarantee Fund) administered by Fisalud, victims of
political violence are entitled to transportation subsidies; medical, surgical
and hospital assistance; physical rehabilitation and psychological support for
one year, but this can be extended for six months; and if not affiliated to a
pension fund, compensation for permanent disability or death.
Through the Social Solidarity Network (Red de Solidaridad Social) victims of
political violence are entitled to receive assistance for permanent disability;
compensation for death; assistance for injury or material loss with no permanent
disability; educational assistance for children of the victim; and assistance
obtaining credit. Victims are also entitled to housing subsidies through the
Ministry of the Environment, Housing and Territorial Development; services of
the National Learning Service; services through the Peace Investment Fund; and
child victims of political violence are entitled to care by the Colombian
Institute of Family Well-being (Instituto Colombiano de Bienestar Familiar).
Colombia reported that according to the Observatory database, as of 28
February 2004, the Social Solidarity Network had provided benefits for 79
antipersonnel mine survivors and Fisalud for 155 survivors.
Many mine survivors are not aware of the services and benefits that are
available to them. In 2003, Paz y Democracia published a guide on procedures to
access the healthcare system and humanitarian assistance for antipersonnel mine
and UXO survivors, containing the relevant
laws.[252] The guide is
intended to complement the “Guide for victim assistance” produced by
the Observatory, which included the rights and procedures available through
FOSYGA and the Social Solidarity Network.
[1] In 2002, the minimum monthly salary was
approximately $110 (309,000 Colombian pesos). Landmine Monitor used the
conversion rate of US$1 = 2,800 peso (May 2003). See CIREC, “Las Minas
Antipersonal, un rompe-cabezas para armar. Diagnóstico de la
Rehabilitación de los sobrevivientes en Colombia,” Bogotá,
April 2003, p. 37. [2] The Law also
provides for National Humanitarian Missions to verify facts and make
recommendations (Article 10) and for International Missions to Determine Facts
(Article 12). [3] The OAS and James
Madison University (USA) supported the event. See Presidencia de la
República, “Expertos Internacionales sobre Minas Antipersonales se
reúnen en Bogotá,” 11 November
2003. [4] Dr. Francisco Santos
Calderón, Vicepresidente de la República de Colombia, Apertura del
Foro Regional de Víctimas de Minas Antipersonal, Bogotá, 12
November 2003. Participants from Argentina, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador,
El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, Perú, the US, OAS, the GICHD
and UNDP participated. [5] Email from
Jackie Hansen, Program Officer, ICBL, 1 April 2004; Letter to Jackie Hansen,
ICBL, from Gabriela Febres Cordero de Moreno, Wife of the Colombian Ambassador
to the US, 5 April 2004. [6]
“Vicepresidencia convoca a medios a foro de minas antipersonales,”
ANCOL (Bogotá), 15 April 2002; “Palabras del Director del Programa
Presidencial en Clausura del Foro,” ANCOL, 17 April
2002. [7] See Article 7 reports
submitted: 27 May 2003 (covering the period 1 March 2002–30 April 2003,
and including 21 annexes); 6 August 2002 (for the period 1 September
2001–30 April 2002); and 15 March 2002 (for the period 1 March–31
August 2001). The initial report was due on 28 August
2001. [8] Oral remarks to the Standing
Committee on General Status and Operation of the Convention, Geneva, 25 June
2004. Landmine Monitor/HRW notes. [9]
In September 2000, UNICEF Colombia and CCCM released a 61-page report drawn from
Landmine Monitor and additional research, entitled “Sembrando Minas,
Cosechando Muerte,” (Sowing Mines, Harvesting Death). CCCM also assisted
in the establishment of the National Mine Action Commission,
CINAMA. [10] The departments are
Antioquia, Arauca, Bolívar, Caldas, Cuaca, Caquetá, Cesar,
Chocó, Cundicamarca, Magdalena, Meta, Nariño, Santander and
Santander del Norte. See also CCCM, Civil Society Action Strengthening Project,
OIM, Bogotá, October 2003. [11]
Alianza’s membership includes several national NGOs, such as the Permanent
Civil Society Assembly for Peace (Asamblea Permanente de la Sociedad Civil por
la Paz), the Latin American Association for Human Rights (ALDHU),
Fundación Cultura Democrática, and
INDEPAZ. [12] Email from Luis Alfonso
Fajardo Sánchez, Alianza, 9 January
2004. [13] ICBL, “Campaign
Deplores Continued Mine Use in Colombia, Press Release, 28 January
2004. [14] Paramilitary groups operate
with the tolerance and often support of units within the Colombian Army. See
Human Rights Watch, The “Sixth” Division: Military-Paramilitary Ties
and U.S. Policy in Colombia, (New York: Human Rights Watch, September
2001). [15] See for example: Statement
by Amb. Julio Enrique Ortiz Cuenca, Colombian Ambassador to Nicaragua, Third
Meeting of States Parties, Managua, 19 September 2001; Statement by Amb.
Nicolás Rivas, Deputy Permanent Representative of Colombia to the United
Nations, in the General Debate of the First Committee, Fifty-Eighth Session of
the United Nations General Assembly, New York, 15 October
2003. [16] ELN also proposed a general
amnesty for political prisoners and prisoners of war, and a bilateral and
temporary cease-fire. Ejército de Liberación Nacional, Comando
Central, “Foro Internacional Minas Antipersonales y Acuerdos
Humanitarios,” Montañas de Colombia, 4 June
2004. [17] Presidencia de la
República, “Intervención del Vicepresidente en foro
internacional minas antipersonal,” Bogotá, 4 June 2004. See also,
Geneva Call, “When the fight against mines revives hopes for peace in
Colombia,” NSA News, Special on Colombia, June 2004; Geneva Call and
Colombian Campaign Against Mines, Media Advisory, Bogotá and Geneva, 8
June 2004. [18] Emails from
Álvaro Jiménez Millán, Coordinator, CCCM, 23 and 24 May
2003; interview with Mehmet Balci, Regional Director for the Middle East and
Europe, Geneva Call, 15 May 2003; email from Mehmet Balci, Geneva Call, 1 July
2003. [19] Geneva Call, “Pilot
mine action zone planned for Bolivar region of Colombia,” NSA News, Vol. 2
Number 1, January 2004, p. 5. [20]
CCCM, Comunicado No. 010, “Foros regionales sobre minas antipersonales,
actores armadas no estatales y acuerdos humanitarios en Antioquia y
Santander,” Bogotá, 20 August
2004. [21] CCCM, Elizabeth Yarce,
“ELN revisa propuesta de paz del Gobierno,” El Colombiano
(Medellín), 21 August 2004; “El Ejército de
Liberación Nacional (ELN) anuncia un estatuto humanitario,” El
Tiempo (Bogotá), 20 August 2004; “Líderes del ELN dicen que
quieren buscar acuerdos de paz,” El Universal, 21 August
2004. [22] “Apoyan paramilitares
plan de desminado en zona norte de Colombia,” Notimex (Bogotá), 27
August 2004. [23] Comisión
Humanitaria de Antioquia, Acta de Posesión, Palabras del Señor
Gobernador Aníbal Gaviria Correa, Medellín, 3 September
2004. [24] Glemis Mogollón V.,
“AUC, a favour de la comisión humanitaria,” El Colombiano, 7
September 2004. CCCM national coordinator, Álvaro Jiménez
Millán, is a member of the
commission. [25] Interview with
Andrés Goyeneche, Advisor, Observatorio de Minas Antipersonal,
Bogotá, 23 April 2004. [26]
Yilberto Lahuerta Percipiano and Ivette María Altamar, Office of Economic
Studies, “The eradication of antipersonnel mines in Colombia: Implications
and Costs,” Economic Archives Document 178, Office of Justice and
Security, National Department of Planning, 1 March 2002, p.
3. [27] Article 7 Report, Form E, 15
March 2002. See also PAAV, “January Report 2002,” p.
10. [28] Letter by the General Command
of the Armed Forces, 21 January
2000. [29] Interview with Engineer
Sergio Rodríguez, Technical Second Manager, INDUMIL, 5 July 2000 and 24
July 2001. [30] Letter by the General
Command of the Armed Forces, 21 January
2000. [31] Antipersonnel Mine
Observatory, “Anti-Personnel Mines in Colombia,” December 2001, p.
5. [32] Antipersonnel Mine
Observatory, “Frecuencia de Eventos,” 1990 al 1 de Septiembre
2004. [33] “Las zonas minadas en
Colombia,” El Tiempo, 29 September
1998. [34] Colombian Navy Registry
Form for Stockpiled AP Mines, presentation by the Navy at the
“Antipersonnel Landmines: Colombia and the Ottawa Convention,”
Seminar, Bogotá, 27 February
2001. [35] Four M48 Czechoslovakian
mines were included in a destruction event on 30 October
2003. [36] US Army, Armament,
Munitions, and Chemical Command (USAMCCOM), Letter to Human Rights Watch, 25
August 1993, and attached statistical tables; US Defense Security Assistance
Agency, Foreign Military Sales of Antipersonnel Mines, FY
1983-1992. [37] Article 7 Report, Form
B, 30 April 2003. [38] “Cuando
el río suena,” Cambio magazine (Bogotá), 29 October
2003. [39] “Desmantelan en
Panamá red de traficantes de armas para Colombianos,” Notimex
(Panamá), 16 May 2003. [40]
“Policía desmantela depósito de minas antitanque de las
FARC,” Agence France-Presse (Bogotá), 2 October
2002. [41] Article 7 Report, Form B,
30 April 2003. The Ministry of Defense is authorized to retain up to 1,000
antipersonnel mines for training and development, according to Law 554,
Colombia’s ratification legislation. The report did not provide
information on the types of mines
retained. [42] Article 7 Report, Form
B, 15 March 2002; Article 7 Report, Form B, 6 August
2002. [43] A number of landmines not
previously reported by Colombia were listed in the report including the M-18,
HE, A-1, M-3, M-21, ATM-19, and MAT-2
mines. [44] Colombian Navy Registry
Form for Stockpiled AP Mines, presented by Navy representatives at the seminar
“Antipersonnel Landmines: Colombia and the Ottawa Convention,” 27
February 2001. Subsequent corrections to this document were provided to the
Landmine Monitor researcher in July 2001. This included 2,194 MN-MAP-1 mines;
1,986 AP-SOPRO mines; and 14 M-14 mines. See Landmine Monitor Report 2001, pp.
309-310. [45] Article 7 Report, Form
B, 30 April 2003, pp. 14-35. [46]
Article 7 Report, 11 May 2004, p.
25. [47] Ibid, p.
27. [48] “Destrucción de
minas almacenadas en Colombia,” Presentation to the Standing Committee on
Stockpile Destruction, 24 June
2004. [49] Letter No. 24828 MDAI from
Minister of National Defense Jorge Alberto Uribe Echavarria to Vice President
Francisco Santos Calderón, dated 3 September 2004, sent to Landmine
Monitor (MAC) by Emersson José Forigua Rojas, Advisor, Directorate of
International Affairs, Ministry of National Defense, 5 October
2004. [50]
Ibid. [51]
Ibid. [52] Article 7 Report, 11 May
2004, pp. 23-27 and Form B, pp.
54-57. [53] Article 7 Report, Form B,
30 April 2003. [54] Vice
President’s Office and Ministry of Defense joint Press Release,
“Colombia Begins Demining Program,” Bogotá, 26 June 2003;
“Militares inician destrucción de 23.451 minas
antipersonales,” EFE (Bogotá), 27 June
2003. [55] These mines had been
stockpiled by the Air Force (356 mines), the Navy (294 mines) and the rest by
the Army. The OAS did not certify the destruction of the 1,152 MAP-2 mines as
it considered these practice mines that did not contain explosives. Interview
with Andrés Goyeneche, Advisor, Observatorio de Minas Antipersonal,
Bogotá, 23 April 2004. [56]
CCCM, Comunicado de Prensa N° 002, Bogotá, 31 May
2004. [57] CCCM, Comunicado de Prensa
N° 008, Bogotá, 16 July
2004. [58] CCCM, Comunicado de Prensa
N° 011, Bogotá, 31 August
2004. [59] Statements by Col.
Paéz, Director, Engineering Directorate, Armed Forces, at a meeting with
CINAMA, CCCM and Geneva Call representatives, 22 January
2004. [60] Letter from Minister of
National Defense Jorge Alberto Uribe Echavarria, dated 3 September 2004. The 391
total differs from the information provided to Landmine Monitor in the 22
January 2004 meeting. At that date the Armed Forces reported that a total of
151 mines were destroyed at the Bejarano Muñoz Battalion in Urabá;
154 mines were destroyed at the Cartagena Battalion; and 10 mines were destroyed
at the Alta Montaña Battalion in Usme, Cundicamarca. The types of mines
and exact dates of these destruction events were not yet available. Statements
by Col. Paéz, Armed Forces, at a meeting with CINAMA, CCCM and Geneva
Call representatives, 22 January
2004. [61] Letter from Minister of
National Defense Jorge Alberto Uribe Echavarria, dated 3 September
2004. [62] Observatorio de Minas
Antipersonal, “Bolívar,” Regional Bulletin No. 2, January
2003, p. 9; Letter from General Nelson Mejía Henao, General Manager,
INDUMIL, to Bernardo Ortiz Bravo, Vice Minister of Defense, No. 16971 G-OJ-016
dated 6 November 2000. The letter mentions Acta 188, 2 July
1999. [63] Article 7 Report, Form D,
11 May 2004, pp. 65-66. [64]
Antipersonnel Mine Observatory, “Frecuencia de eventos, 1990 al 1
Septiembre 2004.” [65] Report
provided by Brig. Gen. Germán Galvis Corona, Commander V Brigade of the
Army, Bucaramanga, 16 January
2004. [66] El Colombiano, 18 May
2003. [67] “Caen 35
paramilitares en Meta y Cundicamarca,” La Libertad (Barranquilla), 18
December 2003. [68] “Hallan
caleta con armas en Caquetá,” El Colombiano, 26 February
2004. [69] Reports on file with
Landmine Monitor. [70] “Las
zonas minadas en Colombia,” El Tiempo, 29 September 1998, p.
13A. [71] Ministry of National
Defense, “Infractions of International Humanitarian Law by the use of
Antipersonnel Mines,” May
1997. [72] See Mine Ban Policy section
of this report for a list of the parties in Colombia’s internal armed
conflict. [73] Juanita León,
“Una Colombia más segura,” Semana (Bogotá), 22
December 2003, p. 62. [74] CCCM field
visits to mine-affected areas in Santa Rosa del Sur, San Pablo, Bolívar,
San Vicente de Chucurí, Santander Department, and Apartadó,
Antioquia Department, November 2000 to February
2001. [75] OEA, AICMA, Portafolio
2003-2004, August 2003, p. 6. [76] US
Department of State, Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor,
“Country Reports on Human Rights and Practices – 2000:
Colombia,” February 2001, p.
42. [77] OEA, AICMA, Portafolio
2003-2004, August 2003, p. 6. [78]
According to the Observatory, of 638 mine-related incidents reported in 2002,
the user responsible for the landmine that caused the incident was not known in
approximately half of the incidents (283 or 45 percent). FARC is listed as
probably being responsible for 237 incidents (37 percent), followed by ELN for
85 incidents (14 percent), “non identified” for 11 incidents (2
percent), and AUC for seven events (1 percent). Antipersonnel Mine Observatory,
“Frecuencia anual por autor de eventos por MAP/UXO 1990-2002,” 9
June 2003. [79] Antipersonnel Mine
Observatory, “Situación de Minas Antipersonal al 1 de Septiembre
2004,” available at www.derechoshumanos.gov.co,
accessed 4 September 2004. [80] Media
Report of the First Brigade, Navy Infantry, Corozal, 25 February
2004. [81] Interview by Álvaro
Gómez, CCCM Coordinator in Cesar, with the Early Alert Sistem (SAT)
Analyst of Córdoba, Angélica Pimienta, Valledupar, 15 February
2004. [82] Meeting of the UNICEF
Colombia mine action country team, Bogotá, 10 March
2004. [83] Interview with Adriana
Córdoba, Program Coordinator, Antipersonnel Mine Observatory,
Bogotá, 21 April 2004. [84]
Defensoría del Pueblo, Resolución Defensorial No. 24,
“Situación de los derechos humanos de los pueblos indígenas
de la Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta y de la Serranía del
Perijá,” Bogotá, 18 September 2002, p.
14. [85] Letter No.
150609/CGFM-EMC-JEOPC-DOPEC-441, “Respuesta oficio No. 13327 –
Resolución Defensorial No. 24, Minas antipersonal cerrro ALGUACIL o
INARWA,” General Carlos Alberto Ospina Ovalle, Commander in Chief,
Colombian Armed Forces, to Minister of Defense Jorge Alberto Uribe
Echavarría, Bogotá, 25 March
2004. [86] Andrés Peñate
Giraldo, Asuntos Políticos y Temática Internacional, Ministry of
National Defense, Letter No. 381, to Dr. Carlos Franco Echavarría,
Director, Presidential Program on Human Rights and International Humanitarian
Law, Bogotá, 20 April 2004. Landmine Monitor has copies of both
letters. [87] United Nations Economic
and Social Council, “Report of the UNHCR on the human rights situation in
Colombia,” Document E/CN.4/2003/13, 24 February 2003, p. 59, available at
www.hchr.org.co
. [88] Letter DM/DPM No. 29088 to Mary
Wareham, Landmine Monitor Global Coordinator, from Colombian Minister of Foreign
Affairs Carolina Barco Isakson, 30 July
2003. [89] Statement signed by the
Comunidad de Paz de San José de Apartadó, Antioquia, 5 January
2001. [90] Letter from Cesar Augusto
Muñoz Lopera, Apartadó’s Ombudsman, to CCCM, No. PMA-140,
signed on 14 March 2001. [91] Penal
denunciation No. 01, No. 00021/DIV-BR17-DH-725, directed to José David
Ibarra Contreras, State Attorney for the Urabá zone, dated in Carepa,
Antioquia, 13 January 2001. [92]
Letter from Minister of Defense Jorge Alberto Uribe Echavarria, dated 3
September 2004. [93] The Navy reported
that it had 998 NM-MAP1 mines emplaced in minefield located at Cartagena Mamonal
(167 mines), Cerro La Pita (166), Cerro Mochuela (498), Cerro Tokio in Valle del
Cauca (93), and Cerro Mecana in Choco department (74). The Navy had withdrawn
its troops from Cerro Tokio and Cerro Mecana. The Air Force had a total of 657
NM-MAP1 antipersonnel mines in minefields located in Cerro Pan de Azúcar
(370 mines), Cerro La María (101), Cerro Nuesa (100), and Cerro Manjui
(86). See Article 7 Report, Form C, first and second tables, 30 April
2003. [94] Notes taken by Landmine
Monitor (MAC) and statement provided to MAC in writing by Col. Julian Cardona
Montoya, Standing Committee on Stockpile Destruction, Geneva, 30 May 2002. A
March 2002 US Department of State report estimated that the Colombian military
maintained approximately 18,000 mines to defend static positions. US Department
of State, “Country Reports on Human Rights Practices – 2001,”
Colombia Report, released 4 March
2002. [95] The Army’s 8,414
mines were: 2,023 APR M14, 1,538 plastic mines, 1,587 Antiexplosiva M1, 865
Explosivas, 690 MAP, 514 M18, 437 M3A1, 311 Sopro, 207 MAP2 Indumil, 87 M16, 74
Indumil ATP, 53 M3, and 28 Explosivas M21. It did not report the location of
the bases, but it specified that all the minefields were marked. Article 7
Report, Form C, first Table, 6 August
2002. [96] Document provided by the
Antipersonnel Mine Observatory to Landmine Monitor, Bogotá, 14 April
2004. [97] Interview with Brig. Gen.
Germán Galvis Corona, Army Fifth Brigade, 16 January
2004. [98] “Uno de cada tres
soldados muertos este año en Colombia ha sido víctima de las minas
antipersonales,” El Tiempo, 6 March
2004. [99] FARC, “Partes
militares y de guerra.” available at www.farcep.org , accessed 30 March
2004. [100]
Ibid. [101] Interview with Carlos
Alberto Riaño, Director, DAS, Florencia, Caquetá, 13 February
2004. [102] Interview with Col. Fredy
Vargas Maldonado, Army Fourth Division, Villavicencio, 16 February
2004. [103]
Ibid. [104] CCCM interview with Carlos
Enrique Melo Valencia, Municipal Spokesperson, El Dorado, Meta, 4 February
2004. [105] CCCM Interview with source
that wishes to remain anonymous, El Dorado, Meta, 4 February
2004. [106] “Sigue
tensión en El Dorado,” El Tiempo (Región Oriente,
Villavicencio), 6 February 2004. [107]
“Oía salir la sangre de mi pierna,” Llano 7 días
(Villavicencio), 9 February
2004. [108] “Desactivan Minas en
Argelia,” El Tiempo, 21 February
2004. [109] Landmine Monitor visit to
Micohaumado, Bolivar Department, 14 March 2004. Landmine Monitor observed the
warning signs. [110] Information
supplied by local inhabitants who prefer to remain anonymous, Landmine Monitor
visit to Micoahumado, Bolívar, 14 March
2004. [111]
Ibid. [112] Information provided by
the CCCM Coordinator in Cesar, following a visit to the region and interviews
with local inhabitants and the spokesperson of Codazzi municipality,
Casacará, Cesar Department, 26 March
2004. [113] “Desactivan campo
minado,” El Liberal (Popayán), 25 March
2004. [114] Vice President’s
Office, Human Rights Observatory, Weekly Press Bulletin, Bogotá, 31
March–6 April 2004. [115]
Information provided to Landmine Monitor (MAC), March
2004. [116]
Ibid. [117]
Ibid. [118]
Ibid. [119] Antipersonnel Mine
Observatory, “Santander,” Regional Bulletin No. 3, January 2003, p.
8. [120] Antipersonnel Mine
Observatory, “Arauca,” Regional Bulletin No. 4, February 2003, pp.
11-12. [121] Mail sent to the Landmine
Monitor by Fernando Guevara, Mines Observatory Advisor, Bogotá, 27 April
2004. [122] Rodrigo Hurtado,
“Caravana por el sur de Bolívar,” El Espectador
(Bogotá), 3 August 2001; Maribel Marin, “Un grupo humanitario con
37 españoles, atrapado en una zona de Combates en Colombia,” El
País (Madrid), 8 August 2001; “Nos quedamos aquí... vayan y
cuéntelo,” Caravana Internacional por la Vida en el Sur de
Bolívar, Bogotá, 20 August 2001. In Wereldwijd Mail (E-zine), No.
81, 24 August 2001. [123] See OAS
Press Release C-234/03, “César Gaviria expresa satisfacción
por desmovilización en Colombia,” 26 November
2003. [124] Colombia has 32
departments, and the capital district of Bogotá, DC. The Observatory has
continuously and incorrectly listed Bogotá as a department in its
database, and omitted the department of San Andrés y Providencia
(Caribbean islands). As of January 2004 then, there were three of 32 departments
that were not mine-affected. [125]
Report by the Mine Observatory, Bogotá, 26 January
2004. [126] Antipersonnel Mine
Observatory Report, “Frecuencia municipal de eventos por MAP/MASE, 1990 al
1 de Septiembre 2004.” [127]
An event by antipersonnel mines or abandoned explosive artefacts is defined by
the Observatory as all acts that occur or have occurred by the suspicion or the
existence of antipersonnel mines or abandoned explosive artefacts. Events are
classified as accidents or incidents. An incident does not involve human
victims. See “ABC Minas Antipersonal, Glosario” IMSMA database,
Antipersonnel Mine Observatory. [128]
List prepared by Landmine Monitor on the basis of Antipersonnel Mine Observatory
Reports, “Frecuencia departamental” and “Frecuencia municipal
de eventos por MAP/MASE,” 1990 al 1 de Septiembre
2004. [129] UN, “Portfolio of
Mine-Related Projects 2003,” p.
88. [130] Defensoría del
Pueblo, Resolución Defensorial Humanitaria No. 10, “Minas
Antipersonal,” 1 March 2002, pp. 14-15; and Programa de Prevención
de Accidentes y Atención a las Víctimas por Minas Antipersonal,
“January 2002 Report,” p.
8. [131] Landmine Monitor uses the
acronym PAAV for the sake of convenience, though it is not an official acronym.
Administered by the Vice President’s Office (Vicepresidencia de la
República), PAAV is part of the Presidential Program on Human Rights and
Application of International Humanitarian Law (Programa Presidencial de Derechos
Humanos y Aplicación del Derecho Internacional
Humanitario). [132] Article 7 Report,
Form A, 11 May 2004, p. 31. [133]
Article 7 Report, Form A, 30 April
2003. [134] Ibid, p.
8. [135] Antipersonnel Mine
Observatory, “Concientización sobre Minas Antipersonal,”
Bogotá, March 2003. [136]
Antipersonnel Mine Observatory, “Atención a las
Víctimas,” Bogotá, March
2003. [137] See the series of Regional
Bulletins for Antioquia, Bolívar, Santander, Arauca, César,
Putumayo, and Norte de Santander, dated from December 2002 to May
2003. [138] Article 7 Report, Form A,
11 May 2004, p. 40; Article 7 Report, Form A, 30 April
2003. [139] Conversion from Colombian
pesos to US dollars was made by the government. See Article 7 Report, 11 May
2003, p. 40. [140] Article 7 Report,
Form A, 11 May 2004, pp. 40-41; Regulatory Decree 3787, 26 December 2003, to Law
848, 12 November 2003, Official Gazette, Bogotá, 12 November
2003. [141] Interview with Adriana
Córdoba, Antipersonnel Mine Observatory, 21 April
2004. [142] Participating
organizations included the Mine Observatory, the ICRC and Colombian Red Cross,
OAS, UN agencies (UNDP, UNICEF, and UNHCR), OIM, CCCM, CIREC, the Humanitarian
Alliance, and other NGOs. Records of the Country Team meetings, UNICEF
Colombia, Bogotá, 10-25 March
2004. [143] Email from Beatriz Elena
Gutiérrez Rueda, Coordinator, Antipersonnel Mine Observatory, 5 March
2003. (Landmine Monitor has a copy of the Agreement.) See also Document
“Acuerdo de Cooperación y Asistencia Técnica entre el
Gobierno de la República de Colombia y la Secretaría General de la
Organización de los Estados Americanos relativo al Plan Nacional de
Acción Integral contra las Minas Antipersonal en Colombia,” 5 March
2003; “OEA y el Gobierno se unen para erradicar minas
antipersonales,” El Universal, 5 March
2003. [144] OAS AICMA Update, Standing
Committee on Mine Clearance, Mine Risk Education and Mine Action Technologies,
June 2004. [145] AICMA is the Spanish
acronym for the OAS Program for Integrated Mine Action Assistance. OEA, Programa
de Asistencia a la Acción Integral Contra las Minas Antipersonal,
Portafolio 2003-2004, August 2003, p.
7. [146] CCCM, “Visita de
Misión de Naciones Unidas a Colombia y Antioquia,” April 2003.
Document emailed to Landmine Monitor (MAC) by Álvaro Jiménez
Millán, Coordinator, CCCM, 24 April
2003. [147] Article 4 of Law 759, 25
July 2003. [148] Interview with
Adriana Córdoba, Antipersonnel Mine Observatory, 21 April
2004. [149] SNE, “Una mina vale
US$80 centavos; Quitarla cuesta US$500,” Presidencia de la
República-SNE, 5 March
2003. [150] Office of Economic
Studies, “The eradication of antipersonnel mines in Colombia: Implications
and Costs,” National Department of Planning, 1 March 2002, p.
ii. [151] Antipersonnel Mine
Observatory, “Eventos por Minas Antipersonal (MAP) / Municiones
Abandonadas sin Explotar (MASE),” 1990 – 1 September
2004. [152] Office of Economic
Studies, “The eradication of antipersonnel mines in Colombia: Implications
and Costs,” National Department of Planning, 1 March 2002, p.
9. [153] CCCM visit to Micoahumado
Village, south of Bolívar Department, September
2003. [154] OEA, AICMA, Portafolio
2003-2004, August 2003, p. 6. [155]
Interview with Ana Luisa Torres, Humanitarian Emergencies Team Advisor, Mine
Observatory, Bogotá, 23 April
2004. [156] Document No. 7324
CGFM-ING-DH-DIH-725, Major General Jorge Ballesteros, Armed Forces General
Inspector, Bogotá, 17 March
2004. [157] Information given to
Landmine Monitor by the Mines Observatory, Bogotá, 23 April
2004. [158] Report presented by Army
Captain Cepeda, Mine Observatory meeting, Bogotá, 26 January
2004. [159] Article 7 Report, Form D,
11 May 2004, p. 70. [160] OEA, AICMA,
Portafolio 2003-2004, August 2003, p.
6. [161] Article 7 Report, Form C and
Annex 16, 30 April 2003. [162]
“Los perros de la guerra,” Semana (Bogotá), 10 October 2002;
“Guerrilla emplea minas antipersonales de plástico que no pueden
ser detectadas,” El Tiempo, 3 September 2002; “Denuncian uso de
minas explosivas de plástico que no se detectan,” El Espectador
(Bogotá), 5 September
2002. [163] Notes taken by Landmine
Monitor (MAC) and statement provided to MAC in writing by Colonel Julian Cardona
Montoya, Standing Committee on Stockpile Destruction, 30 May
2002. [164] Article 7 Report, Form E,
15 March 2002. [165] Álvaro
Jiménez Millán, Coordinator, Colombian Campaign Against Landmines,
response to Landmine Monitor questionnaire, Bogotá, 7 April
2004. [166] “Guerrilleros y AUC
actúan como buenas personas,” Caracol (Cartagena), 31 January 2003;
“ELN y AUC quitarán minas de Morales,” El Tiempo, 4 February
2003. One report notes that the FARC, ELN and ERP guerrillas were involved, as
well as the paramilitaries. The other reports cites only the ELN and
paramilitaries. [167] Actors involved
in MRE since 1999 have included UNICEF, the government’s Antipersonnel
Mine Observatory, UNHCR, the Colombian Red Cross, the Governor’s Bureaus
(Gobernancias) of Antioquia, Santander, Cauca, and Bolívar, the Health
Sector Directorate, Government Secretariat, the Education Secretariat,
Mayoralties in selected municipalities, the Scouts of Colombia
(Asociación Scouts de Colombia), the Archdiocese of Popayán,
INDEPAZ, REDEPAZ, the Assemblea Permanente de la Sociedad Civil por la Paz,
Corporación Paz y Democracia, CCCM, FUNDEMOS, the Foundation
“Mujeres en Pie,” as well as other
groups. [168] OEA, AICMA, Portafolio
2003-2004, August 2003, p. 9. [169]
Email from Jorge Valles, Project Officer, UNICEF Bogota, 27 September
2004. [170] Interview with Diana Roa
Castro, Assistant Officer, Protection and Mines, UNICEF Colombia, Bogotá,
26 March 2004. [171]
Ibid. [172] Email sent by Juan Carlos
Villegas, CCCM Antioquia, Medellín, 12 April
2004. [173] Interview with Diana
Díaz and Adriana Leal, Coordinator and General Assistant, MRE Project,
Fundación Antonio Restrepo Barco, Bogotá, 23 March
2004. [174] Antioquia, Arauca,
Bolívar, Caldas, Cauca, Caquetá, Cesar, Chocó,
Cundinamarca, Huila, Meta, Nariño, Santander, and Norte de
Santander. [175] Response from IOM to
Landmine Monitor questionnaire, Bogotá, 6 April
2004. [176] CCCM, Strengthening Civil
Society Actions, First Trimester Report, Bogotá, December
2003. [177] Interview with Jorge
Quesada, Project Coordinator, Semillas de Esperanza (Seeds of Hope), 16 February
2004. [178] Response to Landmine
Monitor from Iván Molano, Director, Social Pastorate, Archdiocese of
Popayán, Cauca, 17 February
2004. [179] Response to Landmine
Monitor from Nancy Muñoz, Coordinator, Antipersonnel Mine Observatory,
Popayán, Cauca, 18 February
2004. [180] Interview with José
Raúl García, Director, National Youth Program, Colombian Red
Cross, Bogotá, 17 February
2004. [181] Interview with Harold May,
National Executive Director, Colombian Scout Association, Bogotá, 16
February 2004. [182] Response to
Landmine Monitor from Jesús Hernando Paz, Popayán, Cauca, 17
February 2004. [183] Email to
Landmine Monitor (MAC) from Héctor Castro Portillo, Corpojurídica,
13 May 2003. [184] Article 7 Report,
Form I, 11 May 2004, pp. 85-97. [185]
Antipersonnel Mine Observatory Report, Bogotá, 26 January
2004. [186] Article 7 Report, Form I,
11 May 2004, pp. 85-97. [187] Ibid,
pp. 90-91. [188] “Misión
internacional en la costa del Caribe para hacer frente al peligro de las minas
antipersonales,” El Tiempo, 23 February
2004. [189] Article 7 Report, Form I,
11 May 2004, p. 85. [190]
Antipersonnel Mine Observatory, “Bolívar,” Regional Bulletin
No. 2, January 2003, p. 2. [191] UN,
“Portfolio of Mine-Related Projects 2003,” p.
89. [192] Email from Laurence
Desvignes, ICRC Mine Program Coordinator, 26 July
2002. [193] Including the Roosevelt
Hospital, Asamblea Permanente de la Sociedad Civil por la Paz, INDEPAZ, Scouts,
and REDEPAZ. UN, “Portfolio of Mine-Related Projects: Colombia,” 2
May 2002. [194] “Las armas de la
guerrilla en televisión,” El Espectador (Bogotá), 14 August
2002. [195] Interview with Clara
Marcela Barona, Communications Officer, UNICEF Colombia, Bogotá, 10 May
2000. [196] Article 7 Report, Form A,
Annex 2, 30 April 2003. Conversion rate of US$1 = 2,800 pesos (May 2003) was
used. The budget was broken down into five areas according to the national
plan. “Humanitarian demining for humanitarian emergencies” accounted
for nearly 80 percent of the total budget, with approximately US$1.6 million
(4.47 billion pesos) allocated for 2003 and US$11 million (30.79 billion pesos)
for the period from 2003-2006. The next highest expenditure was “the
National Action Plan” with US$550,000 (1.54 billion pesos) allocated for
2003 and US$1.6 million (4.58 billion pesos) for 2003-2006. “Prevention of
landmine accidents” was budgeted US$200,000 (553 million pesos) for 2003
and US$900,000 (2.57 billion pesos) for 2003-2006. “Mine action
information management” was allocated US$33,000 (92.5 million pesos) in
2003 and US$267,000 (748 million pesos) for 2003-2006. Finally,
“International cooperation management” was allocated US$16,000 (45
million pesos) for 2003 and US$60,000 (165 million pesos) for
2003-2006. [197] Article 7 Report,
Annex 2, 30 April 2003. [198]
Ibid. [199] Article 7 Report, Form A,
30 April 2003. [200] Article 7 Report,
Form A, 11 May 2004, pp. 40-41; Regulatory Decree 3787, 26 December 2003, to Law
848, 12 November 2003, Official Gazette, Bogotá, 12 November
2003. [201] Interview with Mariany
Monroy, Information Coordinator, Mine Observatory, Bogotá, 23 April
2004. [202]
Ibid. [203] Resource Mobilisation
Contact Group, “A review of resources to achieve the Convention’s
aims,” Table 2, p. 7, presented by Norway at the Standing Committee on
General Status and Operation of the Convention, 25 June
2004. [204] Article 7 Report, Form A,
30 April 2003. The funds would be allocated as follows: US$256,506 for
administration and supervision, US$130,000 in prevention education, US$30,000
for training of Colombian personnel, US$30,000 for victim assistance, US$30,000
for logistics, and US$9,400 for other
activities. [205] Interview with Tammy
Hall, Coordinator, OAS AICMA Colombia, Bogotá, 18 February 2004.
According to the April 2003 Article 7 report, the OAS had contributed
US$114,000. [206] OAS, “Mine
Action Program: Making the Western Hemisphere landmine-safe,” Resource
Mobilization: Projection of Financial Resources/Requirements 2003-2007, p. 6.
Presented at the Standing Committee on General Status and Operation of the
Convention, 12 May 2003. [207] UN Mine
Action “Emine” website, see project portfolio for Colombia, at www.mineaction.org
. [208] Interview with José
Raúl García, Director, National Youth Program, Colombian Red
Cross, Bogotá, 17 February
2004. [209] CCCM, Strengthening Civil
Society Actions Program, Technical Data and summary 057, Bogotá, October
2003. [210] Interview with Jorge
Quesada, Coordinator, “Semillas de Esperanza” (Seeds of Hope)
Project, Bogotá, 16 February
2004. [211] Interview with Diana Diaz
and Adriana Leal, Coordinator and General Assistant, MRE Project,
Fundación Antonio Restrepo Barco, Bogotá, 23 March
2004. [212] Unless otherwise stated,
all information in this section is taken from Antipersonnel Mine Observatory,
“Víctimas según estado de eventos por MAP/MASE”and
“Frecuencia víctimas según condición por
MAP/MASE,” 1990 – 1 de Septiembre 2004. The Observatory database
contains detailed information on casualties from antipersonnel mines and
unexploded abandoned munitions (MASE, by its Spanish acronym); however, Landmine
Monitor uses the more common acronym UXO for unexploded
ordnance. [213] The newspapers are El
Tiempo (Bogotá), El Espectador (Bogotá), El Colombiano
(Medellín, Antioquia), El País (Cali, Valle del Cauca), El Heraldo
(Barranquilla, Atlántico), and Vanguardia Liberal (Bucaramanga,
Santander). See Antipersonnel Mine Observatory, “Eventos por minas
antipersonal (MAP) / municiones abandonadas sin explotar (MASE),” 1990
– 1 de Septiembre 2004. [214]
For example, the Observatory reported in June 2003 that there had been 530 new
mine and MASE casualties in 2002. In September 2004, the figure had increased to
626 new casualties in 2002. [215]
“OAS/Mine Assistance Program in Colombia,” ICBL Portfolio of
Landmine Victim Assistance Programs, September 2002; Article 7 Report, Form A,
30 April 2003. [216] Since 1999, the
Observatory registered a total of 5,274 mine-related events of which 1,557 were
reported as accidents (30 percent) and 3,717 as incidents (70 percent). Of the
1,557 accidents, 1,436 were caused by antipersonnel mines. Antipersonnel Mine
Observatory, “Eventos por minas antipersonal (MAP) / municiones
abandonadas sin explotar (MASE),” 1990 – 1 de Septiembre 2004.
[217] Antipersonnel Mine Observatory,
“Víctimas según sexo y edad de eventos por MAP/MASE,”
1990–1 de Septiembre 2004. [218]
Ibid. [219] Antipersonnel Mine
Observatory, “Frecuencia de víctimas por minas antipersonal
(MAP)/municiones abandonadas sin explotar (MASE),” 1990–1 de
Septiembre 2004. [220] Presentation by
CIREC, Standing Committee on Victim Assistance and Socio-Economic Reintegration,
28 May 2002; see also Landmine Monitor Report 2001, p.
321. [221] Response from Álvaro
Jiménez Millán, National Coordinator, CCCM, to Landmine Monitor
questionnaire, Bogotá, 7 April
2004. [222] Intervention by
Álvaro Jiménez Millán, Coordinator, CCCM, at the regional
victim assistance forum, Bogotá, 12 November 2003. Cases include
survivors in Morales, Bolívar; El Bagre and Zaragoza, Antioquia; and
Belén de Bajirá, Chocó. Interview with mine survivor in El
Bagre, Antioquia, March 2004. [223]
Program for Mine Accident Prevention and Victim Assistance (PAAV),
“January Report 2002,” p.
2. [224] For more details on the
implementation of the PAAV, see Landmine Monitor Report 2002, pp.
192-193. [225] Presentation by Beatriz
Elena Gutiérrez Rueda, Antipersonnel Mine Observatory, Standing Committee
on Victim Assistance and Socio-Economic Reintegration, Geneva, 13 May 2003; for
more details on expenditure see Article 7 Report, Form J (“Legal framework
for the Attention of the Civilian Victims and their Families,” pp. 51-60),
27 May 2003 and Article 7 Report, Form J, 11 May 2004, p.
106. [226] PAAV, “January 2002
Report,” p. 2. [227] “La
recuperación física y moral de los soldados heridos comienza en el
Hospital Militar Central,” El Tiempo, 6 March
2004. [228] Carlos Andrés
Jaramillo Palacios, “Jean Charles Derien, el francés de
Taganga,” El Espectador (Bogotá), 16 September 2004; interview with
Jean Charles Dérien, Santa Marta, Magdalena, 28 March
2004. [229] Presentation by CIREC,
Standing Committee on Victim Assistance, 28 May
2002. [230] Email from Jeannette Perry
de Saravia, CIREC, 23 September
2004. [231] The event was held with
the support of UNICEF Colombia and Canada. Email from Jeannette Perry de
Saravia, CIREC, 24 May 2003. [232]
Email from Jeannette Perry de Saravia, CIREC, 29 May 2003; for details on
activities in prior years see previous editions of the Landmine Monitor
Report. [233] HI, “Activity
Report 2003,” Brussels, 15 July 2004, p. 19. For details on activities in
prior years see previous editions of the Landmine Monitor
Report. [234] Movimondo,
“Assistenza primaria e sviluppo di soluzioni integrali di riabilitazione
per la popolazione disabile e vittima di violenze nella Colombia
sud-occidentale;” “Riabilitazione di disabili a causa del conflitto
armato nel departamento di Bolivar;” and Annual Report
2003. [235] Interview with Mauricio
Hernández, Communications Advisor, ICRC, Bogotá, 5 April 2004;
ICRC Special Reports, “Mine Action 2003,” Geneva, August 2004, p.
59; “Mine Action 2002,” July 2003, p.
36. [236] Letter sent to CCCM
Santander, by André Junod, ICRC, Bucaramanga, Santander, 10 February
2004. [237] Email from Jeannette Perry
de Saravia, CIREC, 29 May 2003; CIREC, “Las Minas Antipersonal, un
rompe-cabezas para armar. Diagnóstico de la Rehabilitación de los
sobrevivientes en Colombia,” Bogotá, April
2003. [238] “Presentado a la
Asamblea Plan de Desarrollo de Bolívar,” El Universal, 5 March
2004; “Minas antipersonal causan inquietud en Sucre y
Bolívar,” El Universal (Sincelejo), 25 March
2004. [239] Letter from Juan Carlos
Villegas, CCCM Antioquia, Medellín, 12 April
2004. [240] Certificate of Commitment
of the Magdalena Government, Santa Marta, 15 December
2003. [241] Interview with Diana Roa
Castro, UNICEF, 26 March 2004. [242]
Email from Guillermo Gil, CCCM Santander, Bucaramanga, 15 February
2004. [243]
Ibid. [244] Letter from Mauricio
Sierra, Statistics Office, University Hospital Ramón González
Valencia, Bucaramanga, 11 February
2004. [245] “Former foes in
Colombia’s civil war blaze peace trail,” Guardian (London), 5 June
2003. [246] Email from Hector Castro
Portillo, Corpojurídica, 13 May
2003. [247] Antipersonnel Mine
Observatory, “Bolívar,” Regional Bulletin No. 2, January
2003. [248] Regional Seminar on
Antipersonnel Landmine Victims, Bogotá, 12-14 November 2003, proceedings
and statements available at
maic.jmu.edu/conference/proceedings/2003Colombia/index.htm, accessed 12 October
2004. [249] LSN, “Report:
Raising the Voices Landmine Survivor Advocate Training Program,” 5-12 May
2001. [250] Unless otherwise stated
this information is taken from the Article 7 Report, Form J, 11 May 2004. See
also Landmine Monitor Report 2002, pp.
192-193. [251] CIREC, “Las Minas
Antipersonal,” April 2003, p.
24. [252] Paz y Democracia,
“Working guide to follow the required procedures to be able to access the
health services system and humanitarian assistance for MAP and MUSE
victims,” Medellín, June 2003.